ArticlePalliative & supportive care2025
Cross-cultural validation of the integrated palliative outcome scale for neurological patients (IPOS-Neuro S8) in multiple sclerosis patients.
Article in Palliative & supportive care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beyond Cancer: Differences in Psychosocial Burden Between Patients with Chronic Non-Cancer Diagnoses Assessed Using the Integrated Palliative Outcome Scale.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesStandardized measures to evaluate neurological patients in palliative care are missing. The Integrated Palliative Outcome Scale, a self-report tailored for neurological patients (IPOS Neuro-S8) helps identify symptom burden but lacks validation in German. This study aimed to validate the IPOS Neuro-S8 in severely affected multiple sclerosis (MS) patients.
methodsThis validation study is a secondary analysis of data from a clinical phase II intervention study with severely affected MS patients. The original study enrolled German-speaking patients aged 18 with severe MS who receive an escalating immunotherapeutic agent and/or exhibit a high level of disability were recruited from the administrative district Cologne (#DRKS00021783). In this validation study, we evaluated construct, discriminant, and convergent validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and sensitivity to change of the IPOS Neuro-S8, using the "Hamburger Lebensqualitätsmessinstrument" (HALEMS), and the Hospice and Palliative Care Evaluation supplemented by neurological symptoms (HOPE+) as comparison measures.
resultsData from 80 MS patients (mean age 56, SD = 11) were analyzed. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses revealed a 3-factor structure ( SIGNIFICANCE OF
resultsIPOS Neuro-S8 displays promising psychometric properties for assessing palliative care symptoms in severe MS, a model for other severe neurological diseases due to MS's broad central nervous involvement, allowing findings to be transferable to other neurological diseases. A criterion for minimal clinically important difference was established to evaluate the sensitivity to change. Additional validation across different neurological conditions and disease severities is warranted to enhance generalizability and clinical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.