Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40459225›Full record

ReviewBiological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society2025

Ecosystem services provided by spiders.

Pedro Cardoso, Stano Pekár, Klaus Birkhofer, Angela Chuang, Caroline Sayuri Fukushima, Eileen A Hebets, Yann Henaut, Thomas Hesselberg, Jagoba Malumbres-Olarte, Ondřej Michálek and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Data deficiency, taxonomic bias, and economic interests curtail insect and arachnid conservation in the United States.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Exploring Spiders Without Venom as New Sources of Peptidase Inhibitors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Pedro CardosoCE3C - Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes, LIBRe - Laboratory for Integrative Biodiversity Research, CHANGE - Institute for Global Change and Sustainability, Faculty of Sciences, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, 1749-016, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-8119-9960
Stano PekárDepartment of Botany and Zoology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kotlářská 2, Brno, 611 37, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-0197-5040
Klaus BirkhoferBrandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, Cottbus, 03046, Germany.
Angela ChuangDepartment of Entomology and Nematology, University of Florida, Lake Alfred, FL, 33850, USA.
Caroline Sayuri FukushimaFinnish Museum of Natural History (Luomus), Pohjoinen Rautatiekatu 13, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, 00014, Finland.
Eileen A HebetsSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, 68588, USA.
Yann HenautLaboratorio de Conducta Animal, GAIA-BIO, El Colegio de la Frontera Sur (ECOSUR), Av. del Centenario Km. 5.5, C.P, Chetumal, Quintana Roo, 77014, Mexico.
Thomas HesselbergDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3RB, UK.
Jagoba Malumbres-OlarteCE3C - Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes, LIBRe - Laboratory for Integrative Biodiversity Research, CHANGE - Institute for Global Change and Sustainability, Faculty of Sciences, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, 1749-016, Portugal.
Ondřej MichálekDepartment of Botany and Zoology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kotlářská 2, Brno, 611 37, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-7854-1363
Radek MichalkoDepartment of Forest Ecology, Mendel University in Brno, Zemedelska 3, Brno, 613 00, Czech Republic.
Catherine ScottDepartment of Natural Resource Sciences, McGill University, 21111 Lakeshore Road, Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, Montreal, QC, H9X 3V9, Canada.
Jonas WolffEvolutionary Biomechanics, Zoological Institute and Museum, University of Greifswald, Loitzer Str. 26, Greifswald, 17489, Germany.
Stefano MammolaFinnish Museum of Natural History (Luomus), Pohjoinen Rautatiekatu 13, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, 00014, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-4471-9055

Funding

CIHREuropean CommissionHORIZON EUROPE European Innovation Council 101031131HORIZON EUROPE European Innovation Council 101040724HORIZON EUROPE European Innovation Council 101081964HORIZON EUROPE European Innovation Council 861924Italian Ministry of University and Research CN00000033Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaResearch Council of Finland 348352
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spiders, ubiquitous and abundant predators in terrestrial ecosystems, often are the subjects of an unjust negative perception. However, these remarkable creatures stand as unsung heroes within our ecosystems, contributing a multitude of ecosystem services critical to human well-being. Here, we describe the diverse spectrum of ecosystem services offered by spiders and their potential to inspire or directly provide nature-based solutions. Provisioning services include the versatile uses of silk-like and other materials, inspiration for biomimetic technology, medicines derived from venom, hemolymph and silk, bio-insecticides that offer eco-friendly alternatives to synthetic chemicals, food sources for various human communities worldwide, and unconventional yet increasingly valued pets. Regulating services provided by spiders extend to vital roles in pest suppression across diverse agricultural settings, mitigating diseases by curbing insect-mediated pathogen dispersal, and controlling invasive species. Supporting services offered by spiders are equally extensive, involving nutrient cycling through the breakdown of organic matter, acting as food sources for predators, or creating habitats for other organisms. Beyond their tangible contributions, spiders hold a significant cultural and spiritual heritage globally and are integral to many traditional medicine practices. They inspire contemporary culture, provide educational value, contribute to mental health improvement, evoke a sense of place, offer models for scientific discovery, and are commonly employed for monitoring biodiversity and ecosystem health. To pave the way for future research, we present suggestions for exploring and quantifying the economic value of ecosystem services by spiders. While many of these services are well established and studied from various perspectives, others harbour untapped potential. Leveraging what nature inherently provides, these nature-based solutions offer avenues to address challenges such as biodiversity erosion and societal needs. By restoring, preserving, or mimicking natural processes of spiders, we can enhance or provide essential ecosystem services, harnessing the full potential of spiders and the web of benefits they bring us.

Indexed as

EcosystemSpidersAnimalsarachnophobiabiodiversity monitoringbiomimetic technologyhuman well‐beinginsecticidesnature‐based solutionsnutrient cyclingpathogen dispersalpest suppressionsilk

Identifiers

PMID40459225
PMCPMC12586304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.