ArticleDevelopmental science2025
Underestimation and Overestimation of Hand and Arm Length Coexist in Children.
Article in Developmental science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study assessed the structural and functional representation of the upper limb in a large cohort (N = 84) of typically developing children aged 6 to 10. The first task aimed at obtaining a structural measure of the representation of the arm, specifically the two segments that compose it: the forearm and the hand. Participants were asked to localize three landmarks (elbow, wrist, and tip of the middle finger) while blindfolded and upon tactile stimulation of the three landmarks. The second task required a functional estimation of the represented length of the arm. Participants judged whether their arm fully outstretched would be long enough to touch an object presented at seven different distances without being allowed to perform the movement. The two tasks revealed opposite patterns of (mis-)representation. At the structural level, the hand length was underestimated, while the forearm representation matched the actual size. This resulted in an underestimation of total arm length in the structural task. At the functional level, total arm length was overestimated across all age groups. Moreover, there was no relationship between estimates on the structural and functional tasks. These results support the coexistence of multiple, independent body representations in children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.