Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40459202›Full record

ReviewJournal of genetic counseling2025

Interpretative phenomenological analysis and genetic counseling.

Rachel A Starr, Jonathan A Smith

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of genetic counseling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rachel A StarrSchool of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5889-2943
Jonathan A SmithSchool of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck University of London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of qualitative methods in healthcare research has gained acceptance over the last 30 years, and there are now a number of well-established approaches available offering a diversity of aims, procedures, and epistemological emphases. This paper focuses on one such approach, Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA), to provide a discussion and critical overview of its current and future utility for genetic-counseling research. First, the phenomenological and hermeneutic (interpretative) underpinnings of IPA, as well as its methodological commitments to inductive, idiographic, and interrogative working, are considered in the wider contexts of genetic and genomic science, and psychotherapy and counseling research. Then, research using IPA with more direct relevance for genetic counseling is considered in greater depth. This corpus includes those studies that speak to the most frequently endorsed activities of genetic counselors and pass quality evaluations specific to IPA. The literature is organized into three areas: (1) perceptions of genetic risk, (2) how genetic information, such as a diagnosis, personal test, or family history, is understood, and (3) the activity and experience of genetic counseling. Studies concerning perception of risk suggest it is experienced like presence on a radar, becoming more or less prominent or further or nearer from an individual's sense of themselves and their life. Studies concerning the understanding of genetic information imply the importance of multiple contexts in shaping understandings, but also that genetic information can shape experiences of other aspects of life and therefore that contexts may themselves be fluid. IPA used to consider experiences of genetic counseling suggests the importance of expertise in managing uncertainty and the centrality of sense-making in the process for both counselor and counselee. Concluding remarks involve current and future compatibility between IPA and genetic counseling and the call for continuation of what is suggested to be a mutually beneficial dialogue between the two.

Indexed as

Genetic CounselingHumanscounselinggenetic healthgenomic healthcarehealth psychologyinterpretative phenomenological analysislived experiencequalitative researchrisk perception

Identifiers

PMID40459202
PMCPMC12131686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.