ArticleEFORT open reviews2025
Posterolateral tibia plateau fractures: pros and cons of different surgical approaches.
Article in EFORT open reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mixed reality improves agreement on surgical approach selection and patient positioning in tibial plateau fracture planning compared to CT, 3DCT and 3D printing.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026Article
- Comparison of Gerdy's tubercle osteotomy versus conventional anterolateral approach for posterolateral tibial plateau fractures: a retrospective cohort study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Posterolateral tibial plateau fractures are complex injuries requiring a thorough understanding of the anatomical structures involved, including the popliteus tendon, lateral collateral ligament and posterior horn of the lateral meniscus. Standard anterolateral or midline approaches provide limited access to the posterolateral corner, often necessitating specific surgical techniques to achieve optimal fracture reduction and joint stability. This review explores the main surgical approaches used for these fractures outlining their indications, advantages and limitations. Each section provides a step-by-step guide for an effective surgical technique, based on experience from a high-volume trauma center, to optimize exposure, reduction and fixation. Understanding the biomechanical and anatomical aspects of these fractures is crucial for selecting the most appropriate surgical strategy, minimizing complications and improving patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.