ArticleMolecular ecology resources2025
Independent Avian Epigenetic Clocks for Ageing and Development.
Article in Molecular ecology resources, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Information on individual age is a fundamental aspect in many ecological and evolutionary studies. However, accurate and non-lethal methods that can be applied to estimate the age of wild animals are often absent. Furthermore, since the process of ageing is accompanied by a physical decline and the deterioration of biological functions, the biological age often deviates from the chronological age. Epigenetic marks are widely suggested to be associated with this age-related physical decline, and especially changes in DNA methylation are suggested to be reliable age-predictive biomarkers. Here, we developed separate epigenetic clocks for ageing and development in a small passerine bird, the great tit (Parus major). The ageing clock was constructed and evaluated using erythrocyte DNA methylation data of 122 post-fledging individuals, and the developmental clock using 67 pre-fledging individuals from a wild population. Using a leave-one-out cross-validation approach, we were able to accurately predict the ages of individuals with median absolute deviations of 0.40 years for the ageing and 1.06 days for the development clock. Moreover, using existing data from a brood-size manipulation, we show that nestlings from reduced broods are estimated to be biologically older compared to control nestlings, while they are expected to have higher fitness. These epigenetic clocks provide further evidence that, as observed in mammals, changes in DNA methylation of certain CpG sites are highly correlated with chronological age in birds and this opens up new avenues for broad applications in behavioural and evolutionary ecology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.