ArticleJournal of integrative bioinformatics2025
Data management in balance - a decade of balancing pragmatism, sustainability and innovation at plant research center IPK Gatersleben.
Article in Journal of integrative bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pheno-App 2.0 - a mobile app for collecting phenotypic data in plant research.Journal of integrative bioinformatics · 2026Article
- How can biological databases support the new UN mechanism for benefit-sharing from digital sequence information?Scientific data · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK) Gatersleben is a leading international plant science institute specializing in biodiversity and crop plant performance research. Over the last decade, all phases of the research data lifecycle were implemented as a continuous process in conjunction with information technology, standardization, and sustainable research data management (RDM) processes. Under the leadership of a team of data stewards, a research data infrastructure, process landscape, capacity building, and governance structures were successfully established. As a result, a generic research data infrastructure was created to serve the principles of good scientific practice, archiving research data in an accessible and sustainable manner, even before the FAIR criteria were formulated. In this paper, we discuss success stories as well as pitfalls and summarize the experiences from 15 years of operating a central RDM infrastructure. We present measures for agile requirements engineering, technical and organizational implementation, governance, training, and roll-out. We show the benefits of a participatory approach across all departments, personnel roles, and researcher profiles through pilot working groups and data management champions. As a result, an ambidextrous approach to data management was implemented, referring to the ability to efficiently combine operational needs, support daily tasks in compliance with the FAIR criteria, while remaining open to adopting technical innovations in an agile manner.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.