Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40458933›Full record

ArticleJournal of integrative bioinformatics2025

Data management in balance - a decade of balancing pragmatism, sustainability and innovation at plant research center IPK Gatersleben.

Danuta Schüler, Matthias Lange, Thomas Altmann, Maria Cuacos, Daniel Arend, John Charles D'Auria, Anne Fiebig, Jochen Kumlehn, Kerstin Neumann, Michael Melzer and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of integrative bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Danuta SchülerLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK), D-06466 Gatersleben, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4277-9879
Matthias LangeLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK), D-06466 Gatersleben, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4316-078X
Thomas AltmannLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK), D-06466 Gatersleben, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3759-360X
Maria CuacosLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK), D-06466 Gatersleben, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4910-7311
Daniel ArendLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK), D-06466 Gatersleben, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2455-5938
John Charles D'AuriaLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK), D-06466 Gatersleben, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4865-3938
Anne FiebigLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK), D-06466 Gatersleben, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3159-3593
Jochen KumlehnLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK), D-06466 Gatersleben, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7080-7983
Kerstin NeumannLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK), D-06466 Gatersleben, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7451-7086
Michael MelzerLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK), D-06466 Gatersleben, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5213-4030
Elena Rey-MazónLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK), D-06466 Gatersleben, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4813-5927
Hardy RolletschekLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK), D-06466 Gatersleben, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8619-1391
Uwe ScholzLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK), D-06466 Gatersleben, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6113-3518
Evelin WillnerLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK), D-06466 Gatersleben, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4153-4418
Jochen C ReifLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK), D-06466 Gatersleben, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6742-265X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK) Gatersleben is a leading international plant science institute specializing in biodiversity and crop plant performance research. Over the last decade, all phases of the research data lifecycle were implemented as a continuous process in conjunction with information technology, standardization, and sustainable research data management (RDM) processes. Under the leadership of a team of data stewards, a research data infrastructure, process landscape, capacity building, and governance structures were successfully established. As a result, a generic research data infrastructure was created to serve the principles of good scientific practice, archiving research data in an accessible and sustainable manner, even before the FAIR criteria were formulated. In this paper, we discuss success stories as well as pitfalls and summarize the experiences from 15 years of operating a central RDM infrastructure. We present measures for agile requirements engineering, technical and organizational implementation, governance, training, and roll-out. We show the benefits of a participatory approach across all departments, personnel roles, and researcher profiles through pilot working groups and data management champions. As a result, an ambidextrous approach to data management was implemented, referring to the ability to efficiently combine operational needs, support daily tasks in compliance with the FAIR criteria, while remaining open to adopting technical innovations in an agile manner.

Indexed as

Data ManagementPlantsAcademies and InstitutesResearchagile data flows and processesdata stewardshipLIMSplant sciencerequirement engineeringresearch data management

Identifiers

PMID40458933
PMCPMC12327199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.