Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40458889›Full record

ArticlemAbs2025

Computational design of therapeutic antibodies with improved developability: efficient traversal of binder landscapes and rescue of escape mutations.

Frédéric A Dreyer, Constantin Schneider, Aleksandr Kovaltsuk, Daniel Cutting, Matthew J Byrne, Daniel A Nissley, Henry Kenlay, Claire Marks, David Errington, Richard J Gildea and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mAbs, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. IMGTAntibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Frédéric A DreyerExscientia, Oxford Science Park, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0445-7863
Constantin SchneiderExscientia, Oxford Science Park, Oxford, UK.
Aleksandr KovaltsukExscientia, Oxford Science Park, Oxford, UK.
Daniel CuttingExscientia, Oxford Science Park, Oxford, UK.
Matthew J ByrneExscientia, Oxford Science Park, Oxford, UK.
Daniel A NissleyExscientia, Oxford Science Park, Oxford, UK.
Henry KenlayExscientia, Oxford Science Park, Oxford, UK.
Claire MarksExscientia, Oxford Science Park, Oxford, UK.
David ErringtonExscientia, Oxford Science Park, Oxford, UK.
Richard J GildeaExscientia, Oxford Science Park, Oxford, UK.
David DamerellExscientia, Oxford Science Park, Oxford, UK.
Pedro TizeiExscientia, Oxford Science Park, Oxford, UK.
Wilawan BunjobpolExscientia, Oxford Science Park, Oxford, UK.
John F DarbyExscientia, Oxford Science Park, Oxford, UK.
Ieva DrulyteMaterials and Structural Analysis, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Eindhoven, Netherlands.
Daniel L HurdissVirology Section, Infectious Diseases and Immunology Division, Department of Biomolecular Health Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Sachin SuradeExscientia, Oxford Science Park, Oxford, UK.
Newton WahomeExscientia, Oxford Science Park, Oxford, UK.
Douglas E V PiresExscientia, Oxford Science Park, Oxford, UK.
Charlotte M DeaneExscientia, Oxford Science Park, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1388-2252

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Developing therapeutic antibodies is a challenging endeavor, often requiring large-scale screening to produce initial binders, that still often require optimization for developability. We present a computational pipeline for the discovery and design of therapeutic antibody candidates, which incorporates physics- and AI-based methods for the generation, assessment, and validation of candidate antibodies with improved developability against diverse epitopes, via efficient few-shot experimental screens. We demonstrate that these orthogonal methods can lead to promising designs. We evaluated our approach by experimentally testing a small number of candidates against multiple SARS-CoV-2 variants in three different tasks: (i) traversing sequence landscapes of binders, we identify highly sequence dissimilar antibodies that retain binding to the Wuhan strain, (ii) rescuing binding from escape mutations, we show up to 54% of designs gain binding affinity to a new subvariant and (iii) improving developability characteristics of antibodies while retaining binding properties. These results together demonstrate an end-to-end antibody design pipeline with applicability across a wide range of antibody design tasks. We experimentally characterized binding against different antigen targets, developability profiles, and cryo-EM structures of designed antibodies. Our work demonstrates how combined AI and physics computational methods improve productivity and viability of antibody designs.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralDrug DesignSARS-CoV-2COVID-19COVID-19 Drug TreatmentEpitopesHumansMutationSpike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralEpitopesSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2Antibody designartificial intelligenceimmunologymabstructural biology

Identifiers

PMID40458889
PMCPMC12164381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.