ArticleJournal of traumatic stress2025
Feasibility and acceptability of written exposure therapy group in a virtual outpatient setting.
Article in Journal of traumatic stress, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Feasibility and acceptability of written exposure therapy group in a virtual outpatient setting.Journal of traumatic stress · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Written exposure therapy (WET) has emerged as a promising treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) with the potential to overcome common barriers to engagement. Several facets of WET lend themselves particularly well for adaptation to a group setting, yet few studies have examined WET in such formats. The objective of the present study was to present preliminary feasibility, acceptability, and clinical outcome data from a quality improvement project conducted in an outpatient psychiatry clinic that included patients who engaged in a virtual WET group. Participants were 28 adults from six WET group cohorts that occurred between January 2024 and March 2025. Overall attendance was strong (78.2%), with 67.9% of participants completing at least five of the six weekly sessions. Patient satisfaction ratings were high (80.0%), and 86.7% of participants indicated that they would recommend the group to other individuals struggling with trauma symptoms. Acceptability ratings were also largely supportive of the virtual (vs. in-person) and group (vs. individual) formats. There were large effect sizes for pre-post improvement in PTSD symptoms (PCL-5: M = 52.6 vs. 33.0), d = 1.39, and depressive symptoms (PHQ-9: M = 14.2 vs. 9.9), d = 0.86, among participants who completed the group. Our study provides preliminary data suggesting the feasibility and acceptability of a virtual WET group delivered in a naturalistic community setting, with strong attendance and high patient satisfaction. There is significant benefit to standardizing a group-based WET protocol and substantiating clinical benefits through a fully powered randomized controlled clinical trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.