ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2025
Bridging Bioscience to Practice: The Significance of Clinical Simulation Training for Novice Nursing Students.
Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pathways and pitfalls: a qualitative study of student experiences in biomedical science education.FEBS open bio · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to investigate clinical simulation as a learning method to enhance the relevance of bioscience in nursing practice for novice nursing students. Methods: This study utilizes a semi-experimental multi-method design involving 194 novice bachelor nursing students at a Norwegian university college, marking the program's inaugural simulation training. The students were divided into Group 1 and Group 2. Both groups underwent simulation-based training, but Group 2 received an additional extended debriefing where a bioscience specialist linked patient observations with physiological processes. Data collection occurred in two phases: quantitative data were collected on simulation day through a questionnaire and structured observation, and qualitative data from two reflection questions, supplemented with quantitative data from a questionnaire, were collected one week later. Results: The findings revealed that students' emotional states are highly activated during simulation training. Despite this, the students reported that their overall simulation experience was positive. A deficiency in the use of bioscience terminology was identified during debriefing to explain observations, assessments, and actions. The students' reflections on the benefits from simulation training showed that it provides them with practical experience in visualizing real-world scenarios, fostering readiness for action as a nurse, and metacognition of their learning process. Moreover, the findings indicated that students in Group 2 (extended debriefing) were more inclined to incorporate bioscience terminology in their reflective responses, particularly considering the impact of bioscience knowledge on nursing practice. Conclusion: Clinical simulation training provides novice nursing students with clinical experience and an opportunity to connect bioscience with practice. Although the students insufficiently used bioscientific concepts during debriefing, they evaluated the relevance of bioscience in practice highly. Our findings carry significant implications for structuring simulation training, emphasizing the necessity of specialists in both debriefing techniques and bioscience to bridge the gap between theory and practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.