Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40458772›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal. Case reports2025

Voltage threshold adjustments for a novel pulsed-field ablation catheter with integrated mapping capabilities: lessons from a case series.

Thomas Kueffer, Ajay Panakal, Claudia Herrera, Hildegard Tanner, Helge Servatius, Laurent Roten, Tobias Reichlin

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal. Case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Thomas KuefferDepartment of Cardiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse, 3600 Bern, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3553-4945
Ajay PanakalJohnson & Johnson MedTech, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3207-8638
Claudia HerreraDepartment of Cardiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse, 3600 Bern, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6881-3073
Hildegard TannerDepartment of Cardiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse, 3600 Bern, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9722-5617
Helge ServatiusDepartment of Cardiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse, 3600 Bern, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2887-8707
Laurent RotenDepartment of Cardiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse, 3600 Bern, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0827-1329
Tobias ReichlinDepartment of Cardiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse, 3600 Bern, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7197-8415

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Accurate electroanatomical mapping relies on voltage thresholds to differentiate electrically inactive areas, fibrotic scar, and healthy myocardium. These thresholds have been well established for high-density mapping catheters with small, closely spaced electrodes. However, the optimal voltage thresholds for a novel pulsed-field ablation catheter with integrated mapping capabilities remain unclear. This case series evaluates different voltage thresholds for the variable-loop circular catheter (VLCC, Varipulse, Biosense Webster) compared with a dedicated high-density mapping catheter (Octaray, Biosense Webster). Case summary: Four patients undergoing left atrial catheter ablation-including pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), posterior wall ablation, and ablation for scar-related atrial flutter-were mapped using both the VLCC and Octaray catheter. The key findings include: (i) standard voltage thresholds for high-density catheters overestimate voltage in scarred and ablated tissue when applied to the VLCC, necessitating adjusted voltage settings; (ii) the VLCC effectively identified PVI and reconnections, posterior wall isolation, anterior wall scarring, and atrial flutter circuits; and (iii) while the VLCC identified areas of scar, its representation remained less precise compared with high-density mapping. Discussion: This case series demonstrates that the VLCC provides satisfactory mapping performance in common use cases but requires voltage threshold adjustments for accurate visualization. Despite its ability to detect ablation endpoints, scar characterization remains less accurate. Further quantitative analysis of electrogram differences and a prospective evaluation in a larger patient population are necessary to determine the optimal voltage thresholds for this catheter.

Indexed as

Case reportElectroanatomical mappingPulmonary vein isolationVoltage thresholds

Identifiers

PMID40458772
PMCPMC12127796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.