ArticleJournal of medical robotics research
Head-Mounting Surgical Robots for Passive Compensation of Patient Motion.
Article in Journal of medical robotics research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Head-mounted surgical robots are an enabling technology for subretinal injections.Science robotics · 2025Article
- Eye-mounting goggles to bridge the gap between benchtop experiments and in vivo robotic eye surgery.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Head-Mounting Surgical Robots for Passive Compensation of Patient Motion.Journal of medical robotics researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A variety of robot-assisted surgical systems have been proposed to improve precision in the most challenging eye surgeries. However, little attention has been paid to patient motion due to breathing, snoring, talking, and other events that are common during eye surgery. This is problematic because patient motion is typically relative to a grounded surgical robot. In this paper, we characterize the benefits of a new paradigm in which robots are mounted semirigidly and noninvasively to the patient's head. This paradigm utilizes compact high-precision telerobotic systems that have been designed for this use. We present an initial design concept focused on eye surgery, and demonstrate an order-of-magnitude improvement of within-breathing-cycle motion relative to the robot compared to a pillow rest, with an optional head strap, which is the current standard of care, while essentially eliminating gross relative motion. We conduct a human-subjects study to quantify the relative motion that remains. Finally, we present an alternative design concept that leaves the patient's face unobstructed, which may be of interest for other kinds of surgery as well.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.