Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40458754›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical robotics research

Head-Mounting Surgical Robots for Passive Compensation of Patient Motion.

Nicholas R Posselli, Patrick S Wellborn, Paul S Bernstein, Robert J Webster, Jake J Abbott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical robotics research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nicholas R PosselliDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and the Robotics Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Patrick S WellbornDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Paul S BernsteinDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Robert J WebsterDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Jake J AbbottDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and the Robotics Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

Funding

Quantifying the Benefits of Head-mounting in Telemanipulated Robotic Eye TherapiesR21EY027528 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI ABBOTT, JAKE · 2017 to 2018
$385k
NEI NIH HHS R21 EY027528
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A variety of robot-assisted surgical systems have been proposed to improve precision in the most challenging eye surgeries. However, little attention has been paid to patient motion due to breathing, snoring, talking, and other events that are common during eye surgery. This is problematic because patient motion is typically relative to a grounded surgical robot. In this paper, we characterize the benefits of a new paradigm in which robots are mounted semirigidly and noninvasively to the patient's head. This paradigm utilizes compact high-precision telerobotic systems that have been designed for this use. We present an initial design concept focused on eye surgery, and demonstrate an order-of-magnitude improvement of within-breathing-cycle motion relative to the robot compared to a pillow rest, with an optional head strap, which is the current standard of care, while essentially eliminating gross relative motion. We conduct a human-subjects study to quantify the relative motion that remains. Finally, we present an alternative design concept that leaves the patient's face unobstructed, which may be of interest for other kinds of surgery as well.

Indexed as

Eye surgerymicrosurgerymotion compensationretinal surgeryrobot-assisted surgery

Identifiers

PMID40458754
PMCPMC12129400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.