ArticleCritical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine2025
Study protocol and statistical plan for the ICRAKI trial: Intermittent haemodialysis versus continuous renal replacement therapy for severe acute kidney injury in critically ill patients.
Article in Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06032884 (Intermittent Hemodialysis Versus Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy for Severe Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Intermittent Hemodialysis Versus Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy for Severe Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Patients
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- HRRT: hierarchical reinforcement learning for renal replacement therapy decision support.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Renal replacement therapy in intensive care unit: a narrative review.Annals of intensive care · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
36 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The effect of intermittent haemodialysis (IHD) Objective: To summarise the protocol and statistical analysis plan for the ICRAKI trial. Design settings and participants: ICRAKI is a non-inferiority multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing IHD and CRRT. We will include 1000 patients with AKI receiving (or who have received) invasive mechanical ventilation and/or catecholamine infusion and who have at least one recognised criterion for initiating RRT. Intervention: The study compares IHD with CRRT. Main outcomes measures: The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients who will meet one or more criteria for a major adverse kidney event (composite of death, RRT dependence and/or more than a 25 % increase in serum creatinine from baseline value) 90 days after randomisation. Secondary endpoints are time to death; mortality at day (D)28, D60 and D90; number of patients with RRT dependency at D28, D60 and D90; number of patients with more than a 25 % increase in serum creatinine from baseline value at D28, D60 and D90; intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay; time until cessation of RRT; catecholamine-free days, ventilator-free days and RRT-free days through day 28; estimated glomerular filtration rate at hospital discharge; the number of episodes of adverse events. Conclusion: The ICRAKI trial will inform the choice of RRT modalities in critically ill patients with severe AKI. More than 300 patients were already included. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06032884. Date of registration, 2023-09-04.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.