ArticleOphthalmology science
Clinical Features and Natural Progression of Unilateral High Myopia in Adults: A Comparison Study.
Article in Ophthalmology science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical features and biometric profile of patients presenting with unilateral high myopia.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Selective i-wave attenuation in unilateral high myopia.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Risk Factors for Adult Axial Length Elongation: A 5-Year Population-Based Cohort Study.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate and compare the clinical characteristics of patients with unilateral high myopia (UHM) and bilateral high myopia (BHM) based on axial length (AL). Design: A retrospective cohort study. Participants: Adult patients diagnosed with UHM or BHM between March 2011 and August 2021. Methods: Unilateral high myopia was defined as ≥26 mm AL in 1 eye and <26 mm in the other, with ≥2 mm difference. Bilateral high myopia was defined as ≥26 mm AL in both eyes, with ≤3 mm difference. In each patient, the eye with the longer AL was designated the "longer eye" and the other the "shorter eye." We analyzed differences in clinical features, including ophthalmic history, best-corrected visual acuity, ocular biometry, and myopic maculopathy grade. Myopic maculopathy was graded based on atrophy, traction, and neovascularization using a known method. Long-term features included treatments for myopic neovascular maculopathy and myopic tractional maculopathy and AL change over time. Main Outcome Measures: Comparison of clinical characteristics between UHM and BHM groups. Results: We analyzed 369 patients (79 with UHM and 290 with BHM) with a median follow-up period of 4.5 years. The UHM group had a higher proportion of women than the BHM group (88.8% vs. 76.2%, Conclusions: Adult UHM patients mostly lacked associated environmental factors. The poorer visual acuity in the longer eyes of UHM patients, which cannot be explained by structural abnormalities, suggests that the interocular difference may have originated in early childhood. During the follow-up period, AL elongation and myopic complications occurred at similar rates in the longer eye of UHM and both eyes of BHM. Meanwhile, such changes were not observed in the shorter eye in UHM. Further investigation of the underlying mechanisms, such as the genetic factors contributing to this extreme asymmetry, is warranted. Financial Disclosures: The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.