Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40458667›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology science

Pivotal Trial Validating Usability and Visualization Performance of Home OCT in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Report 1.

Jeffrey S Heier, Nancy M Holekamp, Miguel A Busquets, Michael J Elman, Sidney A Schechet, Byron S Ladd, Kapil G Kapoor, Eric W Schneider, Ella H Leung, Ron P Danis and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jeffrey S HeierOphthalmic Consultants of Boston, Boston, Massachusetts.
Nancy M HolekampMidwest Vision Research Foundation, Chesterfield, Missouri.
Miguel A BusquetsRetina Associates of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
Michael J ElmanElman Retina Group PA, Baltimore, Maryland.
Sidney A SchechetElman Retina Group PA, Baltimore, Maryland.
Byron S LaddVirginia Eye Institute, Richmond, Virginia.
Kapil G KapoorWagner Kapoor Institute, Norfolk, Virginia.
Eric W SchneiderTennessee Retina, PC, Nashville, Tennessee.
Ella H LeungGeorgia Retina, Atlanta, Georgia.
Ron P DanisMERIT CRO Inc., Madison, Wisconsin.
Kester NahenNotal Vision Inc., Manassas, Virginia.
Nishant MohanNotal Vision Inc., Manassas, Virginia.
Gidi BenyaminiNotal Vision Inc., Manassas, Virginia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To validate the usability and visualization performance of the index test of the home OCT system (HOCT) during a pivotal study toward de novo US Food and Drug Administration marketing authorization. Design: A prospective, 5-week longitudinal, at-home visualization multicenter study with preplanned office visits at week 1 and week 5 and as-needed interim visits. Participants: The study enrolled adults aged ≥55 years diagnosed with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) on anti-VEGF therapy in at least 1 eligible eye and best-corrected visual acuity of 20/320 or better. Methods: Participants self-installed and imaged daily with the HOCT at home for 5 weeks with 2 or 3 interspersed office visits at 1 and 5 weeks with interim reading center (RC)-triggered visits including a comparator in-office OCT (IO-OCT). Scans with an acceptable quality signal index were independently graded by the RC in a masked manner. Main Outcome Measures: Ability to self-image at home, positive and negative percent agreement (NPA) in visualization of total hyporeflective spaces (TRO) on HOCT and on IO-OCT. Results: At home, self-imaging success rate was 96.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 92.2%-98.4%). One hundred eighty participants self-imaged the primary and secondary eyes 5426 and 4012 times with a mean (standard deviation) manufacturer signal quality index of 4.40 (1.26) and 4.58 (1.28), respectively. Positive percent agreement was 86.6% (95% CI: 80.4%-92.8%) and NPA was 86.1% (95% CI: 80.4%-91.8%), with nearly all disagreements being minimal. Conclusions: The target population successfully self-installed and self-imaged at home with image quality comparable to IO-OCT. The findings of the visualization study support the intended use of the system as a tool to monitor TRO at home between routine clinical visits during the management of nAMD. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Indexed as

Digital health care providerHome OCTNeovascular age-related macular degenerationOCTTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID40458667
PMCPMC12127618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.