ArticleOphthalmology science
Corneal Biomechanics as a Causal Factor in Myopia and Astigmatism: Evidence from Mendelian Randomization.
Article in Ophthalmology science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of orthokeratology with different back optic zone diameters on corneal biomechanics and myopia control: a 1-year randomized, double-blind, self-controlled study.Eye and vision (London, England) · 2026Article
- Mendelian Randomization Studies of Myopia: Choosing the Right Summary Statistics.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Article
- Causal Links Between Corneal Biomechanics and Myopia: Evidence from Bidirectional Mendelian Randomization in the UK Biobank.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The role of anterior segment biomarkers in the development and progression of myopia.Taiwan journal of ophthalmologyReview
- Brillouin microscopy for focal biomechanical measurements in normal and keratoconic corneas: A narrative review.Survey of ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The causal relationship between refractive errors and corneal biomechanical properties remains uncertain. This study aimed to clarify this relationship using Mendelian randomization (MR), offering new insights into the prevention and treatment of refractive errors. Design: A bidirectional, 2-sample MR analysis. Participants: Corneal biomechanical data were obtained from 97 653 European participants in the UK Biobank, whereas refractive error data were sourced from the UK Biobank and FinnGen consortia. Methods: The exposures in this study were identified as corneal biomechanical parameters, specifically corneal hysteresis (CH) and the corneal resistance factor (CRF). The outcomes were defined as refractive errors, including myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism, along with refractive power, encompassing both spherical and cylindrical power. A meta-analysis was performed to combine the MR estimates from both UK Biobank and FinnGen consortia, with heterogeneity assessed using the Q test and I Main Outcome Measures: Corneal hysteresis and CRF as causal factors in myopia and astigmatism. Results: Data from UK Biobank revealed that CH and CRF were protective against the development of myopia (CH: odds ratio (OR) = 0.9936, Conclusions: Corneal biomechanical parameters, particularly CH and CRF, may serve as early biomarkers for predicting myopia. This protective role supports their use in clinical screening to enhance early intervention strategies. Corneal-compensated intraocular pressure is a risk factor for myopia and represents a novel therapeutic target. Future research should clarify the underlying mechanisms and assess biomechanical interventions, potentially transforming refractive error management and reducing visual impairment. Financial Disclosures: The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.