ArticleOphthalmology science
Pediatric Eye-Related Emergency Department Visits and Pediatric Eye Provider Location and Density.
Article in Ophthalmology science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Demographics and costs of pediatric blepharitis and conjunctivitis seen in California emergency departments over a 10-year period.Journal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: There is a shortage of pediatric eye specialists. Inaccessible eye care may lead parents to bring their children to the emergency department (ED) to address eye problems that could have been handled at a clinic visit. This study aimed to determine the association between childhood eye-related ED visits and the location and density of pediatric eye specialists in California. Design: A population-based cross-sectional study. Participants: All California ED visits between January 2012 and December 2021 for patients ≤18 years of age were identified using the California Office of Health Care Access and Information Database. Methods: International Classification of Diseases diagnosis codes were used to identify eye-related ED visits. Public databases were used to identify pediatric ophthalmologist and optometrist addresses. Census data were used to determine the number of visits per 10 000 children in each zip code. Poisson regressions evaluated associations at the zip code level of eye-related ED visits and provider density with geographic sociodemographic factors. Main Outcome Measures: Incidence of pediatric eye-related ED visits. Results: Of the 117 363 721 ED visits in California between 2012 and 2021, 27 346 729 (23.3%) were for children, of which 391 985 (1.4%) were eye-related. Median age was 5.0 years (interquartile range: 2.0, 10.0), and 51.7% were male. The most common diagnoses were conjunctivitis (250 028; 63.8%), chalazion/blepharitis (56 389; 14.4%), and other disorders of the eye/adnexa (13 070; 3.3%). The mean number of visits per year per 10 000 children was 43 ± 12 (median 46, interquartile range: 43, 51). The estimated number of pediatric eye providers in California in 2023 was 142 (1 per 61 413 children). Zip codes with more pediatric eye providers had fewer eye-related ED visits: each additional provider per 10 000 children was associated with 2.1 fewer eye-related ED visits per 10 000 children (95% confidence interval -0.04 to -4.25; Conclusions: Most eye-related ED visits were for nonemergent eye conditions. There was a low eye provider-to-child ratio and an association between provider density and eye-related ED visit incidence. Expanding pediatric eye care could improve access and decrease ED utilization for nonemergent eye concerns. Financial Disclosures: The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.