Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40458646›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025

Predicting the risk of postoperative gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with Type A aortic dissection based on an interpretable machine learning model.

Lin Li, Xing Yang, Wei Guo, Wenxian Wu, Meixia Guo, Huanhuan Li, Xueyan Wang, Siyu Che

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lin Li *Department of Nursing, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Taiyuan, China.
Xing Yang *Department of Nursing, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Taiyuan, China.
Wei GuoFirst Clinical Medical School, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.
Wenxian WuDepartment of Nursing, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Taiyuan, China.
Meixia GuoDepartment of Nursing, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Taiyuan, China.
Huanhuan LiDepartment of Nursing, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Taiyuan, China.
Xueyan WangDepartment of Nursing, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Taiyuan, China.
Siyu CheDepartment of Nursing, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Taiyuan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is a common complication following Type A aortic dissection (TAAD) surgery, significantly impacting prognosis and increasing mortality risk. This study developed and validated a predictive model based on machine learning (ML) algorithms to enable early and precise assessment of postoperative GIB risk in TAAD patients. Methods: Medical records of patients who underwent TAAD surgery at Shanxi Bethune Hospital from January 2019 to September 2024 were retrospectively collected. Predictors were screened using LASSO regression, and four ML algorithms-Random Forest (RF), K-nearest neighbor (KNN), Support Vector Machines (SVM), and Decision Tree (DT)-were employed to construct models for predicting postoperative GIB risk. The dataset was divided into training and validation sets in a 7:3 ratio. Predictive performance was evaluated and compared using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves and DeLong tests. Calibration curves and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to assess model calibration and clinical utility. The SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) algorithm was applied for interpretability analysis. This study adhered to the "Transparent Reporting of a Multivariable Prediction Model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis + Artificial Intelligence (TRIPOD+AI) guidelines." Results: A total of 525 TAAD patients were included, with 63 (12%) developing GIB. Nine predictors were selected via LASSO regression for model construction. The RF model outperformed the SVM, KNN, and DT models in predicting postoperative GIB, with areas under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.933, 0.892, 0.902, and 0.768, respectively, showing statistically significant differences (DeLong test, Conclusion: The machine learning-based predictive model effectively assesses postoperative GIB risk in TAAD patients, aiding healthcare providers in early identification of risk factors and implementation of targeted preventive strategies.

Indexed as

gastrointestinal bleedingmachine learningprediction modelthe SHapley Additive exPlanationType A aortic dissection

Identifiers

PMID40458646
PMCPMC12127380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.