Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40458623›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal. Imaging methods and practice2025

Haemodynamic response of normal aortic valves to stress using invasive, non-invasive, and computational techniques.

Rob Eerdekens, Vijay Govindarajan, Nils P Johnson, Jesse P A Demandt, Mohamed El Farissi, Fabienne E Vervaat, Daniel T Johnson, Richard L Kirkeeide, Pim A L Tonino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rob EerdekensDepartment of Cardiology, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Michelangelolaan 2, Eindhoven 5623 EJ, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3585-0999
Vijay GovindarajanDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Nils P JohnsonWeatherhead PET Center, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, McGovern Medical School at UTHealth and Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0897-2301
Jesse P A DemandtDepartment of Cardiology, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Michelangelolaan 2, Eindhoven 5623 EJ, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6506-7108
Mohamed El FarissiDepartment of Cardiology, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Michelangelolaan 2, Eindhoven 5623 EJ, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0637-0796
Fabienne E VervaatDepartment of Cardiology, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Michelangelolaan 2, Eindhoven 5623 EJ, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6693-7355
Daniel T JohnsonWeatherhead PET Center, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, McGovern Medical School at UTHealth and Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
Richard L KirkeeideWeatherhead PET Center, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, McGovern Medical School at UTHealth and Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0438-6639
Pim A L ToninoDepartment of Cardiology, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Michelangelolaan 2, Eindhoven 5623 EJ, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2099-5426

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: The haemodynamic physiology of the aortic valve has attracted renewed attention after the introduction of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Understanding normal valve function, especially under stress conditions, permits identification of early pathology and quantification of the extent to which TAVI restores normalcy. We aimed to describe the haemodynamic behaviour of a normal aortic valve during stress via invasive, non-invasive, and computational techniques. Methods and results: Our cohort included subjects already undergoing invasive coronary angiography for clinical indications. Haemodynamic measurements were made invasively and non-invasively along with dobutamine infusion. Additionally, patient-specific anatomy from computed tomographic imaging served as input to a computational fluid dynamics model using fluid-structure interaction analysis. We studied 10 subjects with simultaneous invasive sensors and non-invasive echocardiography during dobutamine administration. The majority of normal valves (7 of 10) demonstrated a fall in the invasive gradient during stress, in contrast to the increase noted by Doppler assessment. The stress aortic valve index, a relative measure of pressure loss over the valve during ejection, uniformly exceeded 0.90 with median value of 0.96 and interquartile range 0.94-1.00. Simulation of increased transvalvular flow via faster heart rates produced a highly linear relationship (coefficient of determination Conclusion: Normal aortic valves demonstrated minimal pressure loss even during the high transvalvular flow generated by dobutamine infusion. Computational simulation using anatomy from a normal aortic valve behaved like a resistor, since mean gradient scaled directly with transvalvular flow.

Indexed as

dobutaminefluid–structure interactionshaemodynamicsnormal aortic valvesstress aortic valve index

Identifiers

PMID40458623
PMCPMC12127842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.