ArticleEuropean heart journal. Imaging methods and practice2025
Haemodynamic response of normal aortic valves to stress using invasive, non-invasive, and computational techniques.
Article in European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: The haemodynamic physiology of the aortic valve has attracted renewed attention after the introduction of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Understanding normal valve function, especially under stress conditions, permits identification of early pathology and quantification of the extent to which TAVI restores normalcy. We aimed to describe the haemodynamic behaviour of a normal aortic valve during stress via invasive, non-invasive, and computational techniques. Methods and results: Our cohort included subjects already undergoing invasive coronary angiography for clinical indications. Haemodynamic measurements were made invasively and non-invasively along with dobutamine infusion. Additionally, patient-specific anatomy from computed tomographic imaging served as input to a computational fluid dynamics model using fluid-structure interaction analysis. We studied 10 subjects with simultaneous invasive sensors and non-invasive echocardiography during dobutamine administration. The majority of normal valves (7 of 10) demonstrated a fall in the invasive gradient during stress, in contrast to the increase noted by Doppler assessment. The stress aortic valve index, a relative measure of pressure loss over the valve during ejection, uniformly exceeded 0.90 with median value of 0.96 and interquartile range 0.94-1.00. Simulation of increased transvalvular flow via faster heart rates produced a highly linear relationship (coefficient of determination Conclusion: Normal aortic valves demonstrated minimal pressure loss even during the high transvalvular flow generated by dobutamine infusion. Computational simulation using anatomy from a normal aortic valve behaved like a resistor, since mean gradient scaled directly with transvalvular flow.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.