Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40458616›Full record

ArticleTrauma surgery & acute care open2025

Bite injuries at a level 1 trauma center in Germany.

Christina Polan, Steffen C Kraus, Monika Herten, Heinz-Lothar Meyer, Bastian Mester, Gero Hilken, Marcel Dudda, Max Daniel Kauther, Manuel Burggraf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trauma surgery & acute care open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Christina PolanDepartment of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Steffen C KrausDepartment of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Monika HertenDepartment of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9697-0287
Heinz-Lothar MeyerDepartment of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3472-4758
Bastian MesterDepartment of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Gero HilkenCentral Animal Laboratory, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Marcel DuddaDepartment of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Max Daniel KautherDepartment for Trauma Surgery and Orthopedics, Pediatric Orthopedics, Agaplesion Diakonieklinikum Rotenburg (Wümme), Rothenburg (Wümme), Germany.
Manuel BurggrafDepartment of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, GFO Clinics Mettmann-South, Langenfeld, Langenfeld, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6191-7360

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Bite injuries are a common occurrence and may result in significant morbidity. The aim of the study was to investigate bite injuries, their treatment, and consequences in the urban milieu of a European industrialized nation. Methods: A retrospective, monocentric analysis was conducted on data of bite injuries during the study period from 2010 to 2020. Factors such as age, sex, vaccination status, injury pattern, injury location, the duration of treatment in outpatient, inpatient, or intensive care settings were investigated together with radiological, laboratory, and microbiological parameters, as well as the therapies employed. Results: The majority of the included 442 patients were between the ages of 20 and 50, with a mean age of 37.2±18.4 years (0.7-91). The female sex was more frequently affected (59%). Most bite injuries were caused by dogs (49.9%), followed by cats (36.1%) and humans (9.8%) and were often caused by domestic animals (78%). The hand was the most common site of bites (n=251), followed by the forearms (n=75) and lower legs (n=43). In children under the age of 10, the head was the most common site of bites. In only 5% of patients, injuries extended to deeper structures. Wound infection was observed in 14.7% of the bite wounds. The mean number of treatment days for patients with infected bite wounds was significantly higher than that for patients with non-infected wounds, regardless of whether they were outpatients, inpatients, or intensive care patients (p=0.001, p<0.001, and p=0.003, respectively). Conclusions: In accordance with the severity of the injury, a prompt examination, imaging, laboratory diagnostics, and individualized therapy are required. The implementation of an early therapeutic regimen comprising debridement and irrigation, calculated antibiotic therapy, and immobilization can effectively mitigate the risk of developing a fulminant wound infection. Similarly, bite wounds caused by exotic species are to be treated with haste and precision. Level of evidence: Level III study: non-experimental descriptive studies.

Indexed as

Bites And StingsinfectionsSnake Biteswounds and injuries

Identifiers

PMID40458616
PMCPMC12128427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.