ArticleAsian journal of urology2025
Robotics, artificial intelligence, telepresence, and telesurgery: The future of urology.
Article in Asian journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Safety and feasibility of robotic telesurgery in urological procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical data.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- The need for a dedicated surgical consent framework for robotic telesurgery: a global call to action.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Autologous Tissue Substitutes for Ureteral Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Surgical Techniques and Outcomes.European urology open science · 2026Review
- Best practices in telesurgery: framework and recommendations from the society of robotic surgery (SRS) for safe and effective implementation.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Review
- Transcontinental Telementoring of Abdominal Perineal Resection for Rectal Malignancy Complicated by Pelvic Kidney.CRSLS : MIS case reports from SLSArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.