Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40458542›Full record

Trial reportTransplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation2025

12-Month Outcomes of a Prospective Randomized Trial Investigating Effects of IVIG on Top of rATG Versus rATG Alone in Pre-Sensitized Kidney Transplant Recipients: The INHIBIT Study.

Ondrej Viklicky, Ivan Zahradka, Jan Mares, Janka Slatinska, Alena Parikova, Vojtech Petr, Matej Roder, Katerina Jaklova, Klara Osickova, Libor Janousek and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase IIIEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04302805 (rATG Versus rATG Combined With IVIG Induction Immunosuppression in HLA Incompatible Transplantation), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04302805 phase3completednot on this map

rATG Versus rATG Combined With IVIG Induction Immunosuppression in HLA Incompatible Transplantation

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstitute for Clinical and Experimental MedicineRan2020 to 2024Enrolled17ConditionsKidney TransplantationArmsPrivigen, Thymoglobulin, Plasma Exchange
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ondrej ViklickyDepartment of Nephrology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czechia.
Ivan ZahradkaDepartment of Nephrology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czechia.
Jan MaresDepartment of Data Science, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czechia.
Janka SlatinskaDepartment of Nephrology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czechia.
Alena ParikovaDepartment of Nephrology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czechia.
Vojtech PetrDepartment of Nephrology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czechia.
Matej RoderDepartment of Immunogenetics, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czechia.
Katerina JaklovaDepartment of Immunogenetics, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czechia.
Klara OsickovaDepartment of Nephrology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czechia.
Libor JanousekDepartment of Transplantation Surgery, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czechia.
Petra HrubaTransplantation Laboratory, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czechia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) are commonly used in peri-transplant desensitization, but evidence supporting their efficacy is limited. We conducted a prospective, randomized single-center, open-label, Phase IIIb non-inferiority clinical pilot trial to compare the efficacy of IVIG (administered at a dose of 3 × 0.5 g/kg) versus no IVIG, in conjunction with rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (5-7 mg/kg) induction, in pre-sensitized patients with donor-specific antibodies who had negative pre-transplantation Flow- and CDC-crossmatches, between July 2020 and November 2022. The primary endpoint was the rate of efficacy failure, defined as biopsy-proven rejection within 12-month post-transplant. Secondary endpoints included the incidence of rejection at protocol biopsies, evaluated by histology and biopsy-based transcripts diagnostics. Of the screened patients, 53 (72.6%) were excluded due to crossmatch positivity. Ten patients were randomized to the IVIG+, and 7 to the IVIG-arm. The trial was prematurely terminated due to futility at interim analysis. In the IVIG-arm, 3 patients (43%) experienced the primary endpoint compared to none in the IVIG+ arm (p = 0.026). MMDx identified one molecular ABMR in the IVIG+ and 2 in the IVIG-arm in 12-month protocol biopsies. There was one graft loss in the IVIG-arm. The results of this pilot study, although not definitive, do not support the use of IVIG-sparing regimens in HLA-incompatible kidney transplantation (NCT04302805). This study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier NCT04302805.

Indexed as

Antilymphocyte SerumDesensitization, ImmunologicGraft RejectionImmunoglobulins, IntravenousKidney TransplantationAdultAnimalsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAntilymphocyte SerumImmunoglobulins, IntravenousdesensitizationHLA-incompatible transplantationinductionIVIGkidney transplantation

Identifiers

PMID40458542
PMCPMC12127847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.