Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40458525›Full record

ReviewBMJ open sport & exercise medicine2025

Methodologies, perspectives and strategies to promote holistic assessment of health and activity behaviours in youth with developmental disabilities: a narrative review.

Vincenzo G Nocera, Angela J Wozencroft, Dawn P Coe

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ open sport & exercise medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Vincenzo G NoceraThe University of Tennessee System, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3807-2766
Angela J WozencroftThe University of Tennessee System, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.
Dawn P CoeThe University of Tennessee System, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6386-0700

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physical activity is known to have multiple health benefits for youth with developmental disabilities (DDs). Individuals with DDs are at risk for adverse health-related outcomes. Limited research has shown that the prevalence of youth meeting recommendations for physical activity is low. However, there are challenges in assessing physical activity and achieving adequate compliance in this population, which may lead to inaccurate data. Factors that play a role in the ability of an individual to participate in adequate physical activity to meet recommendations include the ability to perform motor skills and the functional capacity to pursue and engage in a variety of activities. The purpose of this narrative review is to describe the current practices, barriers and strategies associated with physical activity, motor proficiency and metabolic assessments in youth with DDs. This paper elucidates barriers to physical activity, motor proficiency and metabolic assessments in youth with DDs while providing strategies to aid in the successful administration of protocols. Evidence-based and anecdotal evidence provided in this paper supports the use of the following strategies to aid in assessment: peer modelling, parent support, individualised behaviour techniques, positive reinforcement and the use of social narratives. Future work in this area should continue to (a) critically evaluate, implement and develop assessment tools and protocols in youth with DDs and (b) establish reference data specific to the target population.

Indexed as

DisabilityMetabolismPhysical activity

Identifiers

PMID40458525
PMCPMC12128444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.