ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Ventricular volume adjustment of brain regions depicts brain changes associated with HIV infection and aging better than intracranial volume adjustment.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A comparative assessment of age- and gender-related variations in brain morphometry using linear and volumetric MRI analysis.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: While the adjustment of intracranial volume (ICV) is reported to have a significant influence in the outcomes of the analyses of brain structural measures, our study offers a paradigm shift, positing that adjusting for lateral ventricle (LV) inter-individual variability may reveal more atrophic patterns that might be overlooked in analyses without this adjustment,-and such LV-adjusted atrophic patterns may reduce discrepancies observed in earlier studies and better elucidate complex conditions associated with HIV, such as HAND. Methods: To test this hypothesis, we employed a number of adjustment strategies on MRI T1-image-derived data extracted using deep learning models and compared their ability to identify the presence and extent of HIV-specific atrophic patterns based on statistical measures and strength. Results: Our results show that both ICV adjustments may be effective to identify atrophic patterns associated with either aging or HIV in areas of the thalamus, basal ganglia, ventral DC and lateral ventricle, some of which may be overlooked without these adjustments. We also report that LV adjustmenst detect most atrophic patterns associated with HIV and HAND across multiple subcortical regions with more strong statistical strengths, especially the areas of the basal ganglia (putamen, pallidum, caudate nucleus), hippocampus, thalamus, ventral DC, basal forebrain, third ventricle, fourth ventricle, and inferior lateral ventricle. The analyses of LV-adjusted metrics also show that atrophic patterns observed in the hippocampus, thalamus and pallidum were strongly correlated with HAND(especially dysfunction in executive function) and clinical markers (i.e., CD4/CD8 ratio). Conclusion: We conclude that models that control for individual variability in intracranial and ventricular volumes have the potential to minimize discrepancies and variations in structural reports of HIV, improving the diagnostic power of identified patterns and fostering greater consistency across research studies. More importantly, adjusting for LV may not only detect atrophic patterns that could be overlooked in analyses performed without any adjustments, but the outcomes obtained from the adjustments may better explain HIV-associated conditions such as HAND and underlying immunological issues often observed in subjects with HIV treated with combination antiretroviral therapy, considering that the adjustments account for certain aspects of regional interaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.