Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40458456›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2025

Construction and validation of a machine learning based prognostic prediction model for children with traumatic brain injury.

Yongwei Wei, Jiandong Wang, Yu Su, Fan Zhou, Huaili Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury and Healthcare-associated Infections: A Prospective Study on Determinants of Mortality Using Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator Regression.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yongwei WeiDepartment of Pediatrics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Hennan, China.
Jiandong WangDepartment of Pediatrics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Hennan, China.
Yu SuDepartment of Pediatrics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Hennan, China.
Fan ZhouDepartment of Pediatrics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Hennan, China.
Huaili WangDepartment of Pediatrics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Hennan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to establish a prediction model for the short-term prognosis of children with traumatic brain injury (TBI) using machine learning algorithms. Methods: The clinical data of children with TBI who were treated in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University were retrospectively analyzed. All children were divided into a modeling group and a validation group. In the laboratory indicators of the modeling group, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and multivariate Logistic regression analysis were used to screen out the independent influencing factors of poor prognosis in TBI, and a laboratory indicator model (LIM) was established. The risk scores of all patients were calculated. Then, the risk scores and other indicators were used to construct an extended prediction model through the extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) algorithm. The discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility of the model were evaluated, and the extended model was explained using SHAP analysis. Finally, a subgroup analysis was performed using the risk scores to assess the robustness of the laboratory indicator model. Results: Among the laboratory indicators, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), hydrogen ion concentration index (pH), hemoglobin (Hb), serum albumin (Alb), and C-reactive protein to albumin ratio (CRP/Alb) were the independent influencing factors for the prognosis of children with brain injury. The extended model demonstrated excellent predictive performance in both the modeling and validation populations. SHAP analysis showed the contribution values of the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), the laboratory indicator model, the location of the head hematoma, the pupillary light reflex, and the injury severity score in the prediction of the overall patient prognosis. The subgroup analysis showed that there were differences in the risk scores of children with different GCS scores, pupillary light reflexes, and head hematoma locations, and there were also differences in the prognosis between the high-risk score group and the low-risk score group within them. Conclusion: The extended model can accurately predict the prognosis of TBI patients and has strong clinical utility. The core model has good stratification ability and provides an effective risk stratification and personalized patient management tool for clinicians.

Indexed as

childrenmachine learningprediction modelsubgroup analysistraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID40458456
PMCPMC12128090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.