ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2025
Construction and validation of a machine learning based prognostic prediction model for children with traumatic brain injury.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic and prognostic applications of machine learning in paediatric traumatic brain injury: a systematic review of single and multimodal approaches.Frontiers in neurologyPooled it
- Evaluating clinical associations of immediate post-traumatic headache: a prospective multicenter study.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Observational
- Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury and Healthcare-associated Infections: A Prospective Study on Determinants of Mortality Using Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator Regression.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2026Article
- Explainable machine learning reveals multifactorial drivers of early intracranial hematoma progression in traumatic brain injury: development of a SHAP-guided SVM nomogram.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to establish a prediction model for the short-term prognosis of children with traumatic brain injury (TBI) using machine learning algorithms. Methods: The clinical data of children with TBI who were treated in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University were retrospectively analyzed. All children were divided into a modeling group and a validation group. In the laboratory indicators of the modeling group, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and multivariate Logistic regression analysis were used to screen out the independent influencing factors of poor prognosis in TBI, and a laboratory indicator model (LIM) was established. The risk scores of all patients were calculated. Then, the risk scores and other indicators were used to construct an extended prediction model through the extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) algorithm. The discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility of the model were evaluated, and the extended model was explained using SHAP analysis. Finally, a subgroup analysis was performed using the risk scores to assess the robustness of the laboratory indicator model. Results: Among the laboratory indicators, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), hydrogen ion concentration index (pH), hemoglobin (Hb), serum albumin (Alb), and C-reactive protein to albumin ratio (CRP/Alb) were the independent influencing factors for the prognosis of children with brain injury. The extended model demonstrated excellent predictive performance in both the modeling and validation populations. SHAP analysis showed the contribution values of the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), the laboratory indicator model, the location of the head hematoma, the pupillary light reflex, and the injury severity score in the prediction of the overall patient prognosis. The subgroup analysis showed that there were differences in the risk scores of children with different GCS scores, pupillary light reflexes, and head hematoma locations, and there were also differences in the prognosis between the high-risk score group and the low-risk score group within them. Conclusion: The extended model can accurately predict the prognosis of TBI patients and has strong clinical utility. The core model has good stratification ability and provides an effective risk stratification and personalized patient management tool for clinicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.