Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40458366›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Guidance for the Management of Rectal Cancer: An Umbrella Review of Existing Guidelines Regarding Surgical Anatomy, Adjuvant Therapy, Follow-Up and Surveillance, Specific Considerations, Documentation, and Palliative Care.

Ionut Negoi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Exploring disparities in adherence to colorectal cancer clinical practice guidelines and associated survival outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ionut NegoiDepartment of General Surgery, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, ROU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This umbrella review systematically addresses current practices in the management of rectal cancer, covering pertinent terminology, precise surgical anatomy, adjuvant therapeutic regimens, postoperative follow-up protocols, clinical considerations for specific patient scenarios, standards for operative and pathological documentation, and effective palliative care approaches. Emphasis is placed on the essential function of multidisciplinary collaboration and the utilization of uniform terminology to facilitate precise communication and enhance clinical outcomes. The surgical anatomy of the rectum is delineated, specifying the upper anatomical boundary, the surgical anal canal, and the segmentation of the rectum into lower, middle, and upper thirds. Additionally, the review accentuates the clinical relevance of anatomical structures such as the mesorectal fascia, anal sphincter complex, and lateral pelvic lymph nodes, highlighting their critical roles in precise tumor staging and surgical decision-making. Evidence-based recommendations for adjuvant therapeutic approaches are clearly presented, stratified according to tumor stage and established risk factors. Comprehensive guidelines for postoperative surveillance incorporate regular clinical assessments, monitoring of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels, utilization of appropriate imaging techniques, scheduled colonoscopies, and systematic evaluation of patient-reported quality-of-life outcomes. The review specifically addresses complex clinical circumstances, including therapeutic strategies for metastatic (stage IV) rectal cancer, management protocols for acute complications such as hemorrhage, bowel obstruction, and perforation, as well as the importance of rigorous preoperative patient optimization and prehabilitation strategies. Additionally, it delineates detailed standards for documentation within operative and pathology reports and elaborates on evidence-based practices in palliative care management for advanced rectal cancer cases. Lastly, the review underscores the necessity of implementing national databases for comprehensive data collection, fostering specialized training programs for colorectal surgeons, establishing accredited centers of excellence, and conducting systematic audits. These initiatives are crucial to maintaining and enhancing the quality of clinical care and continuously improving patient outcomes.

Indexed as

adjuvant therapyfollow-up and surveillanceguidancerectal cancersurgical anatomy of the rectumtotal mesorectal excision

Identifiers

PMID40458366
PMCPMC12127710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.