ArticleCureus2025
Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage in Class II Composite Restorations Using Two Light-Cure Pulp Capping Agents as Cavity Liners: An In Vitro Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluation of microleakage in composite restorations with various adhesive systems: AnBioinformation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionReducing microleakage is crucial for maintaining the long-term efficacy of composite restorations. The selection of the cavity liner may affect both the marginal seal and the structural integrity of the restoration. This study aimed to assess and compare microleakage in class II composite restorations using two distinct light-cured pulp capping agents as cavity liners, analyzed under a stereomicroscope. MATERIALS AND
methodsClass II cavities with standardized dimensions were prepared for 60 noncarious human mandibular premolars. All the specimens were randomly allocated to three distinct groups, each containing 20 samples. In group 1 (n = 20), a self-etch bonding agent (Scotchbond Universal, 3M, Minnesota, USA) was uniformly applied to the entire cavity using an applicator tip and subsequently light-cured for 20 seconds. The cavities were then restored using composite resin (Filtek Z350 XT, 3M, Minnesota, USA) and light-cured for 30 seconds. In group 2 (n = 20), an approximately 0.8-mm-thick layer of TheraCal LC (Bisco Inc., Illinois, USA) was applied to the axial wall as a cavity liner. Group 3 (n = 20) involved the application of an approximately 0.8-mm-thick layer of Bio-LCB (Essential Dental Systems, New Jersey, USA) on the axial wall as a cavity liner. All tooth surfaces, except the 2-mm-wide area surrounding the edges of each restoration, were sealed with two nail polish coats. This was followed by a 48-hour immersion in 2% methylene blue dye. The teeth were then rinsed and sectioned longitudinally in the mesiodistal direction, coincident with the center of the restoration, using a slow-speed water-cooled diamond disc. To assess microleakage, the two tooth parts exhibiting dye penetration were examined under a stereomicroscope at 20x magnification (RSMr-6 series; Radical Scientific Equipment Pvt. Ltd., Haryana, India). Intergroup comparisons were performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by post-hoc analysis using Tukey's test.
resultsStatistically significant differences were observed between the groups (p < 0.05). Group 1 exhibited the highest mean microleakage values (3.35 ± 0.59), group 2 showed a moderate reduction in microleakage with a mean value of 2.30 ± 1.17, and group 3 had the lowest mean microleakage of 1.15 ± 0.93. Post-hoc analysis revealed significant differences between the groups. Groups 2 and 3 showed better results than group 1 (p < 0.05).
conclusionIt can be concluded that Bio-LCB, as a light-cure pulp capping agent, showed minimal microleakage when used as a cavity liner in class II composite restorations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.