ArticleCureus2025
Decoupling the United States Medical Licensing Examinations (USMLEs) From the Medical Curriculum to Promote Student Well-Being and Professional Identity Development.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) program administers a series of longitudinal assessments across medical education to ensure that future physicians meet baseline competency for independent clinical practice. Through the current system of USMLE integration within medical school education, passing the Step 1 and 2 Clinical Knowledge (CK) exams is required for both application to residency programs and graduation from undergraduate medical education (UME). While the original intentions of such standardized exams were to establish benchmarks for medical knowledge and clinical competence, the current high-stakes system has diverged to the point that USMLE performance is now the single most defining factor utilized in residency consideration. Over-prioritization of USMLE exams by curriculum developers and program directors (PDs) alike has heightened stress levels and intensified reliance on parallel curricula, where the use of third-party resources far outweighs genuine engagement in formal medical school curriculum and education due to perceived inadequacy of classroom didactics in preparing students for board exams. For this reason, we have proposed the separation of USMLE from the medical school curriculum and the transition toward a new system where both Step 1 and 2 CK are postponed until after the residency match. In doing so, we aim to promote enhanced well-being of medical students and increased emphasis on holistic learning based on curiosity and intrinsic motivation for the practice of medicine. There may be unintended consequences to this proposition, particularly with regard to internal assessment of minimum standards for medical school graduation and changes in the residency application process. However, we hold that our proposal, combined with a reevaluation of criteria used in the residency selection process, would support well-roundedness among students and the full realization of their potential as the next generation of physicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.