Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40458317›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nursing studies advances2025

Assessments of unmet communication needs and quality of staff-family communication at geriatric facilities: Instruments development and psychometric testing.

Rinat Cohen, Gal Maydan, Shai Brill, Jiska Cohen-Mansfield

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nursing studies advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rinat CohenMinerva Center for Interdisciplinary Study of End of Life, Tel Aviv University, Chaim Levanon St 55, Tel Aviv-Yafo, 6997801, Israel.
Gal MaydanBeit Rivka Geriatric Medical Center, Clalit Health Services, Ha-Khamisha St 4, Petah Tikva, 4924577, Israel.
Shai BrillMinerva Center for Interdisciplinary Study of End of Life, Tel Aviv University, Chaim Levanon St 55, Tel Aviv-Yafo, 6997801, Israel.
Jiska Cohen-MansfieldMinerva Center for Interdisciplinary Study of End of Life, Tel Aviv University, Chaim Levanon St 55, Tel Aviv-Yafo, 6997801, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Despite an acknowledged need to improve communication between staff and family caregivers of non-communicative care recipients (i.e., care recipients who are unable to engage in discussions with the medical staff about their treatment and care at geriatric facilities), no tools exist to measure the quality of this communication nor the extent to which family caregivers' communication needs are met. Objective: To develop and test two assessment tools to evaluate the extent to which family caregivers' communication needs are met according to family caregivers and for evaluating the quality of communication with the staff member most often consulted. Design: Instrument development, including reliability, validity, and construct testing. Settings: Five geriatric facilities (two geriatric medical centers and three nursing homes) in Israel. Participants: 128 family caregivers of non-communicative care recipients at geriatric facilities. Methods: Based on our previous findings, we developed the Family Caregiver's Communication Needs Questionnaire, which assesses the extent to which family caregivers' communication needs are met according to them, and the Staff-Family Quality of Communication Questionnaire, which evaluates the quality of communication with the staff member most often consulted. We conducted personal interviews with the participants to explore both tools' items and reliability and examined the reliability and convergent validity of the Family Caregiver's Communication Needs Questionnaire in a different sub-sample. The Family Caregiver's Communication Needs Questionnaire's construct was tested using a factor analysis. Results: Both tools' internal consistency reliabilities were high (Family Caregiver's Communication Needs Questionnaire, Cronbach's α = 0.92, 23 items; Staff-Family Quality of Communication Questionnaire, α = 0.86, 8 items). Exploratory factor analysis for the Family Caregiver's Communication Needs Questionnaire reinforced the four factors that emerged in a prior study (staff's availability and attitude, relating to family caregivers' caregiving experience, clarity and reliability of information, and language barriers), accounting together for 63.3 % of the variance. Both tools demonstrated good convergent validity. Conclusions: The Family Caregiver's Communication Needs Questionnaire and Staff-Family Quality of Communication Questionnaire are valid and reliable tools for assessing the quality of staff-family communication, assisting in identifying communication strengths and weaknesses, suggesting potential interventions for improved communication, and providing outcome measures for such interventions.

Indexed as

CaregivingGeriatric facilitiesNon-communicative care recipientsScale developmentStaff-family communication

Identifiers

PMID40458317
PMCPMC12127587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.