ArticleEJHaem2025
Real-World Healthcare Resource Utilisation in Patients With Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome During Azacitidine Treatment: A Population-Based Cohort Study.
Article in EJHaem, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Health-system burden of higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes in England: a literature-based micro-cost analysis.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The hypomethylating agent azacitidine (AZA) is the most widely used first-line treatment for patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) due to its survival benefits. Effective management of higher-risk MDS requires addressing not only clinical outcomes but also the burden of healthcare resource utilisation (hospitalisations and transfusions), which remains poorly characterised. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, population-based study of patients diagnosed with higher-risk MDS treated with AZA between 2010 and 2022. We collected clinical data, including transfusions and hospitalisations, by detailed review of medical records from the initiation of AZA and up to 12 cycles. Results: In total, 103 patients were included, and 94% required supportive care during treatment. Healthcare resource utilisation peaked during the first four cycles. Hospitalisation was necessary for 75% of the patients, and 28% were hospitalised ≥ 3 times. Red blood cell (RBC) transfusions were required for 78% of the patients in the first cycle, and 30% achieved RBC transfusion independence. Conclusion: This study highlights the substantial healthcare resource utilisation for patients with higher-risk MDS receiving AZA, which emphasises the importance of considering these factors in treatment planning. Trial Registration: The authors have confirmed clinical trial registration is not needed for this submission.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.