ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025
Mitigation of image distortion during mechanical testing within a dynamic stereo x-ray system.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05287646 (Quantifying Bone and Skin Movement in the Residual Limb-Socket Interface of Individuals With Transtibial Amputation Using Dynamic Stereo X-Ray), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Quantifying Bone and Skin Movement in the Residual Limb-Socket Interface of Individuals With Transtibial Amputation Using Dynamic Stereo X-Ray
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Dynamic stereo x-ray (DSX) permits Methods: A MuMETAL-lined box contoured to the test frame was developed to divert the magnetic field from the DSX test space. To assess the design, a radiopaque object was placed in the eMTS with shielding and within the DSX capture volume at either 65 or 103 cm from the image intensifiers (IIs) while the speed of the eMTS actuator was systematically increased from 0.1 to 10 mm/s during image collection. Root mean square error (RSME) was calculated over 1,000 frames for each test condition. Results: Results indicated a proportional change in RSME with increasing distance and decreasing speed. At 65 cm, higher actuator speeds (10 mm/s) produced the largest RSME (0.11 mm), significantly higher than the control test. At 103 cm, RSME was below 0.05 mm for all speeds. Conclusion: While closer distance to the IIs and higher actuator speeds produced larger RSME, results indicated that RSME for all experimental conditions fell below the established RSME associated with DSX marker tracking. The MuMETAL-lined box therefore mitigated DSX image distortion caused by the eMTS regardless of distance to the IIs and actuator speed. Clinical Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT05287646.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.