ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2025
Endometrial compaction in patients with chronic endometritis does not predict pregnancy outcomes: a retrospective study.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Endometrial compaction is known to positively influence pregnancy outcomes in patients with infertility undergoing assisted reproductive technology. However, the impact of endometrial compaction on pregnancy outcomes in patients with chronic endometritis following antibiotic treatment is not well understood.Considering the unique characteristics of patients with chronic endometritis, we aimed to investigate whether endometrial compaction predicts pregnancy outcomes during frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles in this population. Methods: We enrolled 769 patients who underwent hysteroscopy before frozen-thawed embryo transfer over the past 3 years and subsequently categorized them into the populations with and without chronic endometritis to analyze the impact of endometrial compaction on pregnancy outcomes. To adjust for potential confounding factors, a multifactor binary logistic regression analysis was conducted using clinical co-variables that may have impacted the cycle results. Results: In patients with chronic endometritis following antibiotic treatment, endometrial compaction was not significantly associated with biochemical pregnancy (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.020, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.639-1.627), clinical pregnancy (AOR = 1.028, 95% CI = 0.643-1.643), ectopic pregnancy (AOR = 2.003, 95% CI = 0.145-27.635), early pregnancy loss (AOR = 1.356, 95% CI = 0.502-3.663), ongoing pregnancy (AOR = 0.970, 95% CI = 0.600-1.569), and live birth (AOR = 0.881, 95% CI 0.545-1.423). However, endometrial compaction was related to higher rates of clinical pregnancy (AOR = 1.623, 95% CI = 1.052-2.504), ongoing pregnancy (AOR = 2.193, 95% CI = 1.403-3.429), and live birth (AOR = 2.244, 95% CI = 1.431-3.520) in patients without chronic endometritis. Conclusion: Endometrial compaction was associated with improved pregnancy outcomes in patients without chronic endometritis but did not predict pregnancy outcomes in those with chronic endometritis, even after antibiotic treatment, suggesting that other factors influence pregnancy success in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.