Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40458164›Full record

ArticleJDS communications2025

Repeated infusion of killed

B D Enger, G Hastings, C S Gammariello, M X S Oliveira, K M Enger

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in JDS communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

B D EngerDepartment of Animal Sciences, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, The Ohio State University, Wooster, OH 44691.
G HastingsDepartment of Animal Sciences, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, The Ohio State University, Wooster, OH 44691.
C S GammarielloDepartment of Animal Sciences, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, The Ohio State University, Wooster, OH 44691.
M X S OliveiraDepartment of Animal Sciences, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, The Ohio State University, Wooster, OH 44691.
K M EngerDepartment of Animal Sciences, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, The Ohio State University, Wooster, OH 44691.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mastitis reduces milk yield of affected mammary glands, but the mechanisms that reduce mammary gland productivity are unclear. We previously aimed to develop a reduced milk yield mastitis model via a single sterile intramammary infusion of oyster glycogen but failed to observe milk yield response even when milk SCC spiked greater than 3,000,000 cells/mL. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of repeatedly challenging mammary glands in a split-udder model to determine if duration of immune response would affect milk yields. Four mid-lactation primiparous cows were used. Quarters of a randomly selected udder half were infused with saline (SAL), whereas the quarters of the opposite udder half were infused with 2 billion cfu of formalin-fixed

Identifiers

PMID40458164
PMCPMC12126820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.