Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40458161›Full record

ArticleJDS communications2025

Data processing techniques to improve data integration from dairy farms.

Jacquelyn P Boerman, Luiz F Brito, Maria E Montes, Jacob M Maskal, Jarrod Doucette, Kirby Kalbaugh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JDS communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jacquelyn P BoermanDepartment of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907.
Luiz F BritoDepartment of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907.
Maria E MontesDepartment of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907.
Jacob M MaskalDepartment of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907.
Jarrod DoucetteAgriculture Data Services, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907.
Kirby KalbaughAgriculture Data Services, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large-scale data generation on dairy cattle farms is expected to continue increasing due to more animals per farm and the adoption of on-farm sensors and technologies that generate additional information on individual animals in greater frequency. Siloed data and information, lacking interoperability, prevent end users from combining data from multiple data sources and drawing more meaningful conclusions from the data generated on farm. As a result of these data challenges, the objective of this technical note is to describe a process of designing and documenting the development of a data ecosystem that automatically collects, performs quality control, and integrates data from disparate data sources used on experimental and commercial dairy farms. Integrated data can be queried to answer specific questions or generate timed reports that provide more insight than singular data sources can provide. Our objective was to develop a collaborative research data infrastructure that enables comprehensive data accessibility through an integrated computational ecosystem comprising open-source technologies of JupyterHub, Python, and Apache Spark. This shared curated environment facilitates extensive dataset consumption, empowering users to leverage distributed computing resources and parallel processing capabilities for sophisticated multi-dataset analysis and integration. Before user accessibility, the farm data undergo a rigorous multistage preprocessing protocol designed to mitigate potential data integrity challenges. These comprehensive data curation steps systematically address complex variability with sources, including vendor-specific software modifications, intermittent data retrieval disruptions, and farm-level operational contingencies. Employing sophisticated data cleaning, transformation, and validation methodologies, the infrastructure ensures robust data standardization and quality assurance. The integration of datasets from different data sources is paramount for improving dairy cattle welfare and production efficiency, which are complex management and breeding goals influenced by a multitude of traits that can be measured by different sensors. We identified research and further development needed in the field of dairy data science (e.g., data editing and quality control procedures, references and standards for novel sensor-based variables, and validation of obtained data across sensors), which is expected to continue playing a major role in the dairy industry sustainability.

Identifiers

PMID40458161
PMCPMC12126813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.