Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40458151›Full record

ArticleJDS communications2025

Effect of double disinfectant application during premilking teat disinfection on teat cleanliness, bacterial count, and mastitis in pasture-grazed dairy cows.

Thiago Resin Niero, Roberto Kappes, Angelica Leticia Scheid, Andreina Ferreira Ramos, Larissa Henrique da Silva, Leonardo Leite Cardozo, Sandra Maria Ferraz, André Thaler Neto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JDS communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Thiago Resin NieroCentro de Ciências Agroveterinárias, Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (CAV/UDESC), Lages, SC, Brazil 88520-000.
Roberto KappesCentro de Ciências Agroveterinárias, Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (CAV/UDESC), Lages, SC, Brazil 88520-000.
Angelica Leticia ScheidCentro de Ciências Agroveterinárias, Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (CAV/UDESC), Lages, SC, Brazil 88520-000.
Andreina Ferreira RamosCentro de Ciências Agroveterinárias, Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (CAV/UDESC), Lages, SC, Brazil 88520-000.
Larissa Henrique da SilvaCentro de Ciências Agroveterinárias, Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (CAV/UDESC), Lages, SC, Brazil 88520-000.
Leonardo Leite CardozoOrdemilk, Treze Tílias, SC, Brazil 89650-000.
Sandra Maria FerrazCentro de Ciências Agroveterinárias, Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (CAV/UDESC), Lages, SC, Brazil 88520-000.
André Thaler NetoCentro de Ciências Agroveterinárias, Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (CAV/UDESC), Lages, SC, Brazil 88520-000.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of double disinfectant application during premilking teat disinfection on heavily soiled teats has proven effective in reducing the teat cleanliness score and certain bacterial groups in freestall confined cows. We aimed to compare the efficacy of a single (SDA; before forestripping) and a double (DDA; before and after forestripping) disinfectant application on teat cleanliness score, bacterial counts, and the incidence of subclinical and clinical mastitis in pasture-grazed dairy cows. Initially, 2 groups of 8 cows were assigned to receive either SDA or DDA lactic acid and hydrogen peroxide application, using a dip cup. The treatments were applied at every milking to all lactating cows participating in the experiment. The experiment was conducted over an 8-mo period. Cows calving during this period were alternately assigned to one of the 2 groups after 7 d. Every 15 d, both before (PRE) and after (POST) treatment, we evaluated the teat cleanliness score (TCS) and collected swabs from teat skin to quantify gram-negative bacteria (coliform and noncoliform),

Identifiers

PMID40458151
PMCPMC12126830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.