ReviewJournal of translational autoimmunity2025
Autoantibodies as prognostic markers in rheumatoid arthritis.
Review in Journal of translational autoimmunity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Protective and Pathogenic Antibodies to Citrullinated Antigens.Immunological reviews · 2026Review
- Refining serological scores in rheumatoid arthritis classification: an international study.RMD open · 2026Article
- Immune imbalance in rheumatoid arthritis: insights from γδ T cell receptor phenotyping.Human cell · 2026Article
- Compared effectiveness of TNF inhibitors, JAK inhibitors, and csDMARDs in naïve rheumatoid arthritis patients: a real-world, observational, multi-center, retrospective cohort study in Northwest China.Clinical rheumatology · 2026Observational
- Autoantibody and biomarker detection in the follow-up of autoimmune diseases: state of the art and future perspectives.Journal of translational autoimmunity · 2026Review
- Immunological heterogeneity in rheumatoid arthritis: challenges in early-stage stratification, non-response to targeted therapy, and the restoration of immune tolerance.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Primary care anti-cyclic citrullinated protein antibody testing for rheumatoid arthritis and accompanying pathway redesign reduces unnecessary referrals.Rheumatology advances in practice · 2026Article
- Serum test for secretory component-containing anti-citrullinated protein antibodies as a novel prognostic tool in rheumatoid arthritis at-risk subjects.Journal of translational autoimmunity · 2025Article
- Rheumatoid factor and anti-citrullinated protein IgA antibodies in the diagnosis, prognosis and monitoring of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.Journal of translational autoimmunity · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disorder characterized by progressively destructive polyarthritis. Key autoimmune features include the presence of autoantibodies. The purpose of this review is to discuss the diagnostic and prognostic properties of rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-citrullinated protein/peptide antibodies (ACPA), based on current use in Sweden. Furthermore, we discuss their relation to disease outcomes and their importance for management of patients with RA. Principal findings: Based on current cut-offs, ACPA has a higher specificity for RA than RF, and testing for ACPA alone is recommended when investigating patients with clinically suspect RA. The diagnostic utility of RF may improve with adjusted reference range/upper limit of normal.RF and ACPA both predict rapid radiographic progression, severe extra-articular manifestations and mortality, whereas other outcomes, such as osteoporosis, pain and disability are not as clearly related to seropositivity. RF/ACPA positive patients respond better to some targeted therapies, in particular rituximab, compared to seronegative RA patients. Recent studies indicate that treatment of ACPA-positive arthralgia with abatacept may delay and perhaps sometimes even prevent development of arthritis. Available evidence does not support an added value of repeated RF or ACPA testing. Conclusions: Testing for ACPA in patients with arthralgia or suspected early RA, and for ACPA and RF at RA diagnosis, provides useful diagnostic and prognostic information, which has implications for follow-up and treatment. Repeated testing for ACPA and RF is not recommended. Potential future developments include treatment of ACPA-positive individuals for prevention of arthritis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.