ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Barriers underlying care gaps in Singapore's mental health landscape and suggestions for improvement from service providers' perspectives: a qualitative approach.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite the high prevalence of mental health conditions globally, there are few studies investigating perspectives of providers on barriers underlying care gaps. Therefore, the primary aim of this project was to understand barriers underlying care gaps and suggestions for improvement from mental healthcare service providers in Singapore. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 mental healthcare providers from public and private sectors, including administrators, practitioners, and an advocate. Participants were recruited via purposive sampling and snowballing. Interview transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: Barriers underlying service accessibility included insufficient integration across organizations and sectors for timely referrals and concerns about stigma of receiving services. Barriers to service effectiveness included limited public sector bandwidth and lack of supervision requirements for private sector allied health practitioners. General practitioners (GPs) faced financial and referral issues when serving as first touchpoint for mental healthcare. Fragmentation of information systems hindered coordinated care implementation, while lengthy referral forms and complex referral routes created additional obstacles. Public sector manpower issues and heterogeneity in frontline staff's skills for right-siting patients hindered capacity maintenance. Conclusion: These findings highlight systemic challenges related to under-resourcing and a lack of coordination across sectors and organizations, ultimately hindering equitable access to mental healthcare. To address these challenges, recommendations include expanding insurance coverage, strengthening private sector regulation, and reforming reimbursement structures for integrated care. Streamlining referrals and improving data sharing will enhance coordination. Additionally, normalizing mental health conversations, empowering support networks, and increasing access to community-based services will reduce stigma and provide timely care, ultimately improving service delivery and access.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.