Trial reportAnaesthesiology intensive therapy2025
Tracheal intubation with GlideScope vs. Sanyar video laryngoscopes in adults with predicted difficult intubation: a non-inferiority clinical trial.
Trial report in Anaesthesiology intensive therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMaintaining control over the airway is critical during general anesthesia induction, particularly in patients with anticipated difficult airways. Video laryngoscopy with various devices has emerged as a valuable tool in such scenarios and has shown promising performance. This study aimed to evaluate glottic visualization and the first attempt success rate of tracheal intubation of GlideScope and Sanyar video laryngo- scopes in adult patients with predicted difficult intubation. MATERIAL AND
methodsA randomized, controlled, two-armed, parallel clinical trial was conducted, in adult patients with anticipated difficult intubation undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia. Participants were randomly assigned to either the GlideScope or Sanyar group. The primary outcome was the success rate of intubation in the first attempt at laryngoscopy, and secondary outcomes were the duration of intubation, glottic visualization, blood pressure and heart rate after intubation.
resultsA total of 93 patients were included in the analysis, with 46 in the S group and 47 in the G group. The S group demonstrated a significantly higher first-attempt success rate of tracheal intubation (93.4% vs. 85.2%;
conclusionsThe Sanyar video laryngoscope exhibited superior efficacy in terms of first-attempt tracheal intubation success and shorter intubation time compared to the GlideScope in adult patients with predicted difficult airways. These findings suggest that the Sanyar video laryngoscope may serve as a valuable alternative in challenging intubation scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.