ArticlePhysical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP2025
First principles prediction of wavelength-dependent isomerization quantum yields of a second-generation molecular nanomotor.
Article in Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Second-generation molecular nanomotors are gaining popularity within the biomedical field and intense research is being conducted to increase their efficiency for light-induced ultrafast photoisomerization. A key requirement for designing efficient molecular nanomotors is ensuring unidirectional rotation during isomerization and thermal helix inversion. Here, we used non-adiabatic trajectory surface hopping molecular dynamics based on TDDFT to study the excited state dynamics of the stable M- and metastable P-conformers of a second-generation Feringa-type molecular nanomotor. From the trajectories, we computed quantum yields for clockwise and anti-clockwise photoisomerization. Results show that the helicity of the initial structure dictates the direction of the isomerization: 52% of the trajectories starting from M-conformers isomerize clockwise, whereas 23% of the trajectories starting from P-conformers isomerize anti-clockwise. The quantum yield for clockwise isomerization can be maximized by excitation in the center of the absorption spectrum (350-400 nm). In this region, the M-conformer exhibits its maximum absorption and maximum (clockwise) isomerization quantum yield, whereas the P-conformer shows negligible excitation probability and (anti-clockwise) isomerization quantum yield. Moreover, we also find several trajectories, where thermal helix inversion occurs in the hot ground state, directly after excited state relaxation. While helix inversion was observed to proceed in both directions, its net effect favors unidirectional rotation. We further report excited state lifetimes and details about the structural dynamics.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.