ReviewAnaesthesia2025
Measurement and interpretation of central venous pressure: a narrative review.
Review in Anaesthesia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Integrated haemodynamic monitoring of fluid responsiveness and fluid tolerance in critical care: from physiology to bedside applications.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2026Review
- Baseline-Referenced Longitudinal Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Fluid Management After Kidney Transplantation: A Retrospective Comparison with Central Venous Pressure-Guided Care.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Pathophysiology and Perioperative Considerations for Heart Failure Patients.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Forgotten but Striking: Complete Tricuspid Valve Degeneration Unmasked by Lancisi's Sign.Cureus · 2026Article
- The Right Ventricle in Cardiac Critical Care: Pathophysiology, Evaluation and Management.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Central Venous Pressure Revisited: Physiology, Pitfalls, Misconceptions, and Modern Clinical Interpretation in Critical Care.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Superior vena cava perforation after central venous catheterization: the diagnostic role of progressive CVP elevation in occult injury-a case report.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Article
- Role of Central Venous Pressure and Mean Arterial Pressure to Central Venous Pressure Ratio in Assessing Poisoning Severity and Poor Outcomes in Intensive Care Unit-Admitted Acute Aluminum Phosphide-Poisoned Patients.Cardiovascular toxicology · 2026Article
- Catastrophic consequences of prolonged immobilization after intracerebral hemorrhage: a case report of crush syndrome combined with capillary leak syndrome.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Perioperative Care of Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Cross-Sectional Canadian Multidisciplinary Survey.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2026Article
- Machine Learning-Based Identification of Patients with Elevated Central Venous Pressure Using Features Extracted from Photoplethysmography Waveforms.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Article
- Association between the Venous Excess Ultrasound (VExUS) score and acute kidney injury in critically ill patients with sepsis: a multicenter prospective observational study.Annals of intensive care · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCentral venous pressure has been a key component of haemodynamic monitoring for several decades, but its clinical utility is still debated. While central venous pressure has been used traditionally to assess intravascular volume status and fluid responsiveness, mounting evidence suggests that its absolute value alone is an unreliable predictor of such states. This narrative review explores the historical development and physiological foundations of central venous pressure, its measurement techniques and the available evidence regarding central venous pressure monitoring in various clinical scenarios.
methodsWe conducted a literature search to identify relevant articles. The abstracts of identified articles were assessed for relevance, and their references were screened for further relevant publications.
resultsWe identified 229 articles, with 72 undergoing full text extraction and data synthesis. Preliminary work in central venous pressure monitoring began in canines, before early human studies and the development of Guytonian principles of haemodynamics. Physiologically, central venous pressure reflects intraluminal pressure of the superior vena cava, with measurement affected significantly by transducer position, catheter position and intrathoracic pressures. In right ventricular dysfunction, the central venous pressure waveform loses its x-descent, as the y-descent becomes exaggerated. Central venous pressure in isolation is considered a poor predictor of volume responsiveness; however, elevated central venous pressure is linked with impaired tissue perfusion and poor clinical outcomes, including acute kidney injury and higher risk of mortality in certain patient cohorts. DISCUSSION: Although reliance on central venous pressure as a singular guide for fluid resuscitation is discouraged, it remains a valuable tool when interpreted in conjunction with waveform analysis and trend monitoring, offering insights into right heart function, venous congestion and organ perfusion. As patient cohorts grow increasingly complex, a nuanced understanding of central venous pressure waveforms and trends is essential for optimising management strategies in peri-operative and critical care settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.