ArticleEcology2025
Positive covariation between current reproduction and subsequent performance in a raptor: Is the devil in the details?
Article in Ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The theory about reproductive trade-offs suggests that as reproduction is costly, individuals should trade current reproduction against future reproduction or survival, leading to within-individual negative covariation between current reproduction and future performance. Despite clear predictions at the individual level, within-individual negative covariations do not always translate into negative covariations at the population level: the devil may be in the details. For instance, if one sex only exhibits negative covariations between current reproduction at t and performance at t + 1, the covariation at the population level may be null or positive. Similarly, ignoring age effects may prevent the detection of negative covariations between current reproduction and subsequent performance at the population level. For a monogamous species with biparental care of young, a negative covariation between current and subsequent demographic performance is expected, similar for both sexes, but potentially stronger for the oldest senescent individuals. Here, we take advantage of a long-term individual monitoring of male and female little owls (Athene noctua) and state-of-the-art capture-mark-recapture models to assess covariation between vital rates between two consecutive years at the population level. When analyzing all individuals together, we found a positive covariation between reproduction in year t and survival or reproduction in year t + 1, regardless of sex, indicating that individuals with a high reproductive success in a given year tend to survive and reproduce better in the following year. This is an important finding because such positive covariations between demographic rates at the population level may overestimate the population growth rate. Looking more closely at individuals of known age within the population, we found evidence for age-specific expression of reproductive trade-offs. Population-level covariation between current reproduction and subsequent demographic performance may thus mask more complex patterns of covariation between vital rates at finer scale.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.