Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40457802›Full record

ArticleEcological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America2025

Decadal change in seabird-driven isotopes on islands with differing invasion histories.

Penelope P Pascoe, Mitchell Bartlett, Justine Shaw, Rowan Trebilco, Christine K Weldrick, Holly P Jones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Decadal change in seabird-driven isotopes on islands with differing invasion histories.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Penelope P PascoeUniversity of Tasmania Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, Ecology and Biodiversity, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9586-1046
Mitchell BartlettIndependent Contractor, Nelson, New Zealand.
Justine ShawSecuring Antarctica's Environmental Future, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Rowan TrebilcoCSIRO Environment, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
Christine K WeldrickAustralian Antarctic Program Partnership, Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
Holly P JonesDepartment of Biological Sciences, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5512-9958

Funding

Ecological Society of Australia Holsworth Wildlife EndowmentMargaret Middleton Fund for Endangered Australian Native Vertebrate AnimalsNational Geographic Society's Committee for Research and Exploration WW-222R-17
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Invasive mammal eradications are commonplace in island conservation. However, post-eradication monitoring beyond the confirmation of target species removal is rarer. Seabirds are ecosystem engineers on islands and are negatively affected by invasive mammals. Following an invasive mammal eradication, the recovery of seabird populations can be necessary for wider ecosystem recovery. Seabirds fertilize islands with isotopically heavy nitrogen, which means that nitrogen stable isotope analysis (δ

Indexed as

BirdsCharadriiformesIntroduced SpeciesNitrogen IsotopesAnimalsEcosystemIslandsNew ZealandTime FactorsNitrogen Isotopeschronosequenceecosystem functionecosystem recoveryeradicationrodentsseabird islands

Identifiers

PMID40457802
PMCPMC12130745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.