ArticleJournal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition2025
Pediatric gastrostomy feeding tube weaning strategies: A scoping review.
Article in Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nutritional adequacy and diet diversity following a tube weaning program.Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition · 2026Article
- Pediatric gastrostomy feeding tube weaning strategies: A scoping review.Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pediatric feeding tubes (FTs) are used to support nutrition and hydration needs, but ought to be weaned when children are able to eat safely by mouth to maintain growth. We performed a scoping review of FT weaning interventions for children (<21 years) dependent on long-term FTs. Study design, patient characteristics, intervention strategies, setting, duration, interventionist(s), primary study measures, short-term and long-term outcomes are described. Two independent reviewers extracted all data and came to consensus using the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology; a third reviewer resolved discrepancies as needed. Forty-five articles met the inclusion criteria. Most interventions took place in outpatient or inpatient settings, although home, telemedicine, and school settings were also represented. The majority of interventions were led by interdisciplinary teams. Strategies varied and were used in combination, most commonly: parent training and/or education, hunger provocation, and behavioral approaches. Most interventions weaned a majority of children to oral feeding, often with additional success in follow-up; a handful of studies demonstrated that a minority of patients required resumption of FT after initially weaning. Successful programs weaning children from FTs to oral feeding have occurred across various environments involving heterogeneous teams and strategies. Nearly all interventions involve a combination of strategies, parent training and/or education, and three or more interventionists, demonstrating the complexity of weaning programs. To establish best practices for weaning children from FTs when medically safe to do so, future work ought to establish standard measurement tools for treatment outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.