ArticleInfection control and hospital epidemiology2025
Whole-genome sequencing surveillance of vancomycin-resistant
Article in Infection control and hospital epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveVancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) can cause serious healthcare-associated infections. Patients can become colonized and infected through contact with healthcare workers, hospital surfaces, equipment, and other patients. We evaluated the utility of broadly applied whole-genome sequencing (WGS) surveillance of vancomycin-resistant
designRetrospective genomic and epidemiologic analysis of clinical VREfm isolates.
settingBrigham and Women's Hospital, an 800-bed tertiary care center in Boston, MA, USA.
methodsVREfm was isolated from patient screening and diagnostic specimens. We sequenced the genomes of 156 VREfm isolates, 12 at the request of infection control and 144 as a convenience sample, and used single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) differences to assess relatedness. For isolate pairs separated by 15 or fewer SNPs by two orthogonal comparison methods, we mapped epidemiologic connections to identify putative transmission clusters.
resultsWe found evidence for 16 putative transmission clusters comprising between two and four isolates each and involving 41/156 isolates (26.3%). Our analysis discovered 14 clusters that were missed by traditional surveillance methods and additional members of two clusters that were detected by traditional methods. Patients in four transmission clusters were linked only by exposure to the postanesthesia care unit.
conclusionsWe show that WGS surveillance for VREfm can support infection control investigations and detect transmission events missed by routine surveillance methods. We identify the postanesthesia care unit as a locus for VREfm transmission, which demonstrates how WGS surveillance could inform targeted interventions to prevent the spread of VREfm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.