ArticleThoracic research and practice2025
The Value of Inverted Images for Pulmonary Nodule Detection.
Article in Thoracic research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveChest X-ray (CXR) is the most commonly used initial modality for most lung diseases, including pulmonary nodules. In diseases such as lung cancer, tuberculosis, and fungal infections, detecting a single nodule in the early stages will facilitate treatment. One of the most important obstacles to searching for a single pulmonary nodule on a CXR is peripheral background contrast enhancement, and density differences. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the superiority of inverted gray scale to the standard image of CXR in the detection of a single pulmonary nodule. MATERIAL AND
methodsThe design of the study included the evaluations of two radiologists unaware of each other, and past computed tomography reports. They randomly evaluated standard and inverted gray scale images of posteroanterior CXRs of both nodule-containing and non-nodule-containing patients, totaling 100 in total. Each evaluation was graded from one to three as one stood for nodule negative, two was for doubtful and three was for nodule positive ones.
resultsThe percentage of the patients who were correctly identified as having the nodule [sensitivity (inverted 68.15% - standard 57.14%)] and not having [specificity (inverted 87.56% - standard 88.71%)] showed a statistically significant difference in inverted gray scale (negative) image compared to the standard image (
conclusionInverted chest radiogram is significantly exposing the nodule presence over the white background so that should be highlighted and considered as a part of useful scanning. So that in terms of functional benefit and additionally cost effectiveness, we advice this technique in part of routine CXR evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.