SynthesisAnnals of transplantation2025
Effects of Donor-Recipient Race Matching on Kidney Transplant Survival.
Synthesis in Annals of transplantation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Given the scarcity of donor organs in the United States, the ability to prolong kidney transplant graft survival is a significant public health concern. Although it has been suggested that donor-recipient race-matching could improve kidney transplant outcomes, findings of previous studies are inconsistent. Therefore, the objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review examining the relationship between Black and White donor-recipient race-matching and graft and patient survival in adult primary kidney transplant recipients. MATERIAL AND METHODS Ovid Medline and Embase literature searches were conducted from earliest index date through October 2024. The following data were extracted and summarized: study characteristics, patient population characteristics, and findings associated with graft and patient survival. Quality assessment and magnitude of effects were evaluated, and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) was used to determine evidence certainty. RESULTS Of 4676 citations, 7 studies met inclusion criteria. Two studies reported Black-Black donor-recipient pairings, 2 studies reported Black-White donor-recipient pairings, and 3 studies reported White-Black donor-recipient pairings were at significantly higher risk for graft failure than the reference group; however, effect magnitude was small. Studies found the relationship between race-matching and patient survival was not statistically significant. Per GRADE, evidence concerning graft and patient survival is of low certainty or quality. CONCLUSIONS Studies generally found no differences in patient survival, and although Black-Black, Black-White, and White-Black donor-recipient pairings were associated with decreased graft survival in some studies, effects were small and likely clinically irrelevant. Further investigation of modifiable factors influencing graft survival is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.