ReviewBasic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology2025
Real-World Complexity of Prescribing Cascades.
Review in Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Dose-dependent relationships in potential prescribing cascades: a cohort study using community pharmacy dispensing data.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prescribing cascades occur when an adverse drug reaction (ADR) to one medication is treated with additional medication. Most literature focusses on this simplistic singular concept of one medication followed by another. However, ADRs in clinical practice may appear less straightforward, making prescribing cascades difficult to identify and deprescribe. More insight is needed into the real-world complexity of prescribing cascades, since they may negatively impact both patients and the healthcare system. This article aims to provide exemplary cases of the real-world complexity of prescribing cascades and explores strategies to identify, mitigate and prevent them. The real-world cases discussed highlight the multifaceted nature of prescribing cascades in clinical practice. They show several factors contributing to the challenges in recognizing ADRs and preventing prescribing cascades, including misinterpretation of ADRs, fragmented healthcare systems and accumulation of pharmacological effects and comorbidities within an individual patient. Several strategies are recommended to improve identification, mitigation and prevention of prescribing cascades. Although educating patients and healthcare providers (HCPs) can help bridge the knowledge gap, additional strategies are needed. Implementing supportive tools to deprescribe, enhanced communication among HCPs and patients regarding ADRs and rationale for medication changes, and monitoring patients for ADRs are considered the most promising strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.