ArticleJournal of inherited metabolic disease2025
Characterizing Diagnostic Delays in Metachromatic Leukodystrophy: A Real-World Data Approach.
Article in Journal of inherited metabolic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical management of metachromatic leukodystrophy cases identified in the German and Austrian Newborn screening pilots.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2026Article
- Newborn Screening for Metachromatic Leukodystrophy: A Systematic Literature Review.International journal of neonatal screening · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neurodegeneration in metachromatic leukodystrophy (MLD) may be preceded by systemic complications. Characterization of these features is critical to define barriers to early diagnosis and treatment eligibility for gene therapy. We utilized medical billing (claims) datasets and a natural history study to capture pre-diagnosis MLD-related events. MLD-related events (ICD-10-CM codes) were aggregated into system-based diagnosis clusters, and time to MLD diagnosis (TTD) computed for each organ-system diagnosis cluster. Differences in TTD distribution, instantaneous diagnosis hazard, and survival to MLD diagnosis were compared by sex and payor type. TTD and regression from onset of first symptoms were described using median and inter-quartile range. The claims dataset identified 174 MLD cases (diagnosis ≤ 6 years old) with 14 diagnosed within the first year of life. General neurologic concerns (n = 138; median 257 days pre-diagnosis), gastrointestinal (n = 137; 231 days), seizures (n = 48; 236 days), ophthalmologic (n = 46; 362 days), and language-related events (n = 41; 267 days) were common. Time to MLD diagnosis from onset of prodromal clusters was longer for children with non-commercial insurance: most prominent with seizures (survival logrank p value < 0.02) and non-degenerative neurological symptoms (survival logrank p value < 0.04). Similar findings were noted in our analysis of a second claims dataset. The natural history cohort demonstrated a similar pattern of prodromal disease features and delayed diagnosis. This study defines barriers to MLD diagnosis and highlights prodromal periods of pre-regression symptomatology, further supporting the need for early screening in this fatal disorder of childhood.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.