Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40457518›Full record

ArticleCNS neuroscience & therapeutics2025

Restoration of Glymphatic Influx After Photothrombotic Stroke Using Low-Intensity Focused Ultrasound.

Ming-Yen Hsiao, Yu-Ling Lin, Meng-Ting Lin, Wei-Hao Liao, Wen-Shiang Chen, Chueh-Hung Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CNS neuroscience & therapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ming-Yen HsiaoDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yu-Ling LinDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Meng-Ting LinDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Wei-Hao LiaoDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Wen-Shiang ChenDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chueh-Hung WuDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-3979-3541

Funding

National Science and Technology Council 110-2314-B-002-065National Science and Technology Council 112-2314-B-002-137-MY3National Science and Technology Council 112-2321-B-002-024National Science and Technology Council 113-2314-B-002-214National Taiwan University Hospital 110-S5124National Taiwan University Hospital 112-S0155National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch 110-BIH009National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch 111-HCH003National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch HR-114-H05National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch NHRI-111-B01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThis study aimed to investigate the regional modulation effect of low-intensity focused ultrasound (LIFU) on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) influx dynamics, focusing on the differential changes between hemispheres in a mouse model of unilateral ischemic stroke.

methodsLIFU was administered with a commercial transducer at the unilateral M1 cortex of mice using specific parameters (0.5 MHz center frequency, 250 kHz pulse repetition frequency, 300 ms burst duration, 2 ms pulse length, 50% intraburst duty factor, 2 s interstimulation interval, spatial peak temporal average intensities of 0.5 W/cm

resultsLocalized LIFU stimulation at the M1 region triggered a rapid CSF influx, peaking 20-30 min poststimulation. Following photothrombotic stroke, a marked reduction in CSF influx was observed in both ipsilesional and contralesional MCA regions, most notably on Days 1 and 3, with a return to baseline by Day 7. However, daily contralesional LIFU stimulation for 7 days effectively restored CSF influx on both sides.

conclusionDaily contralesional LIFU stimulation restores impaired CSF influx bilaterally after stroke, suggesting potential therapeutic implications for stroke-related pathophysiology.

Indexed as

Glymphatic SystemThrombotic StrokeUltrasonic TherapyAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLcerebrospinal fluidglymphaticlow‐intensity focused ultrasoundstroke

Identifiers

PMID40457518
PMCPMC12129706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.