Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40457510›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2025

Robust multi-coil MRI reconstruction via self-supervised denoising.

Asad Aali, Marius Arvinte, Sidharth Kumar, Yamin I Arefeen, Jonathan I Tamir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Asad AaliDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2120-5722
Marius ArvinteIntel Corporation, Hillsboro, Oregon.
Sidharth KumarChandra Family Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
Yamin I ArefeenChandra Family Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2194-1945
Jonathan I TamirChandra Family Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.

Funding

Interoperable Software Platform for Reproducible Research and Clinical Translation of MRIU24EB029240 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI LUSTIG, MICHAEL, UECKER, MARTIN · 2019 to 2023
$1.6M
Google Research Scholar ProgramNational Science Foundation CCF-2239687National Science Foundation IFML 2019844NIBIB NIH HHS U24 EB029240NIH HHS U24EB029240Oracle for Research Fellowship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo examine the effect of incorporating self-supervised denoising as a pre-processing step for training deep learning (DL) based reconstruction methods on data corrupted by Gaussian noise. K-space data employed for training are typically multi-coil and inherently noisy. Although DL-based reconstruction methods trained on fully sampled data can enable high reconstruction quality, obtaining large, noise-free datasets is impractical.

methodsWe leverage Generalized Stein's Unbiased Risk Estimate (GSURE) for denoising. We evaluate two DL-based reconstruction methods: Diffusion Probabilistic Models (DPMs) and Model-Based Deep Learning (MoDL). We evaluate the impact of denoising on the performance of these DL-based methods in solving accelerated multi-coil magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reconstruction. The experiments were carried out on T2-weighted brain and fat-suppressed proton-density knee scans.

resultsWe observed that self-supervised denoising enhances the quality and efficiency of MRI reconstructions across various scenarios. Specifically, employing denoised images rather than noisy counterparts when training DL networks results in lower normalized root mean squared error (NRMSE), higher structural similarity index measure (SSIM) and peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) across different SNR levels, including 32, 22, and 12 dB for T2-weighted brain data, and 24, 14, and 4 dB for fat-suppressed knee data.

conclusionWe showed that denoising is an essential pre-processing technique capable of improving the efficacy of DL-based MRI reconstruction methods under diverse conditions. By refining the quality of input data, denoising enables training more effective DL networks, potentially bypassing the need for noise-free reference MRI scans.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingAlgorithmsArtifactsBrainDeep LearningHumansKneeSignal-To-Noise Ratioaccelerated reconstructiondeep learninggenerative diffusion modelsMRIself‐supervised denoising

Identifiers

PMID40457510
PMCPMC12354090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.